← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Railway Services: South-West

14 January 2025

Lead MP

Martin Wrigley
Newton Abbot
LD

Responding Minister

Simon Lightwood

Tags

Transport
Word Count: 8928
Other Contributors: 12

At a Glance

Martin Wrigley raised concerns about railway services: south-west in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I ask the Minister to reassure Network Rail that funding will be secured for the critical fifth phase of the Dawlish rail resilience programme. I also urge the Government to ensure HS2 developments do not further disrupt services in the south-west.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Newton Abbot
Opened the debate
The south-west relies heavily on its mainline railway as an economic lifeline. The 2014 Dawlish storm incident caused a £35 million repair cost and an estimated £1.2 billion loss to the local economy, highlighting the critical nature of rail services in the region. Since then, while improvements have been made, including a new sea wall at Dawlish and rebuilt stations, the final phase of resilience work remains underfunded and at risk.

Government Response

Simon Lightwood
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport
Government Response
The Minister thanked all hon. Members for their contributions and highlighted the Government's commitment to fixing Britain’s railway, with a focus on improving services for passengers and delivering better value for money. He mentioned that £165 million has been invested in the south-west resilience programme at Dawlish, ensuring better journey reliability during severe weather conditions. The Minister also addressed capacity issues around Devon and the impact of Old Oak Common on rail services to the south-west.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.