← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme: Capital Disregard

10 June 2025

Lead MP

Liam Conlon
Beckenham and Penge
Lab

Responding Minister

Andrew Western

Tags

Housing
Word Count: 9238
Other Contributors: 12

At a Glance

Liam Conlon raised concerns about mother and baby institutions payment scheme: capital disregard in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government should introduce an indefinite capital disregard for payments made under Philomena's law so that victims do not lose their means-tested benefits and social care support due to the compensation received.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Beckenham and Penge
Opened the debate
Philomena Lee was sent to Sean Ross Abbey mother and baby home in Ireland where she gave birth to her son, Anthony. She never saw him again after he was sold for adoption. There were more than 56,000 women and 57,000 children who suffered mistreatment and abuse in Irish mother and baby homes until the 1990s. The compensation scheme opened in March 2021 but has resulted in additional burdens as any money accepted through the payment scheme is considered savings, leading to a loss of benefits such as housing benefit or pension credit for more than 13,000 survivors living in Britain.

Government Response

Andrew Western
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
Government Response
Responding to the debate, Andrew Western highlights the importance of addressing the historical injustice faced by individuals in mother and baby institutions. He acknowledges the significant number of people potentially affected who now live in the UK but emphasizes that determining exact numbers or costs is challenging due to various factors including movement between countries.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.