← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Medal for Wounded Service Personnel
09 December 2025
Lead MP
David Baines
St Helens North
Lab
Responding Minister
Louise Sandher-Jones
Tags
No tags
Word Count: 2756
Other Contributors: 3
At a Glance
David Baines raised concerns about medal for wounded service personnel in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The debate calls for the creation of a brand-new medal for all servicemen and women wounded in combat, separate from emergency service personnel but equally deserving recognition due to the unique nature of military service.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
There is no official recognition for those wounded in the UK's military. Since January 2006, a total of 2,644 personnel have sustained battle injuries while on operation; one such individual being Andy Reid who lost his right leg below the knee, left leg above the knee and right arm above the elbow.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Committed to the debate by highlighting the need for formal recognition for soldiers wounded in combat during the Northern Ireland troubles.
Paul Waugh
Lab/Co-op
Rochdale
Fully supports the campaign, praising Andy Reid's work and his motto that he is a survivor not a victim. Argues that those who have risked life and limb deserve recognition.
Peter Dowd
Lab
Bootle
Endorses the proposal and highlights the support provided by local organisations such as Veterans in Sefton for veterans across Merseyside.
Government Response
Louise Sandher-Jones
The Minister for Veterans and People
Government Response
Acknowledges the debate's importance and the work done by campaigners like Andy Reid MBE. Explains that medals are awarded based on clear criteria under royal prerogative, with Cabinet Office-led committees ensuring fairness. States officials are considering proposals for a defined injury medal to recognise service personnel wounded in operations.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.