← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
BBC Charter Renewal
06 January 2026
Lead MP
John Whittingdale
Maldon
Con
Responding Minister
Stephanie Peacock
Tags
No tags
Word Count: 14696
Other Contributors: 25
At a Glance
John Whittingdale raised concerns about bbc charter renewal in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The Government should consider alternatives to the licence fee system and discuss what the future role of the BBC should be before deciding on funding methods. The debate around a smaller BBC should not be dismissed as it questions whether maintaining eight national television channels and ten radio stations is still necessary with increased alternative media options.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Since the last debate on BBC funding, major editorial failings have occurred, including 'Panorama' reporting issues and coverage controversies. There were also shocking revelations about harassment and bullying within the organisation. The number of people declaring unwillingness to pay the licence fee has increased by 300,000, contributing to a £1.1 billion loss to the BBC due to non-payment or declaration of non-use. This is exacerbated by high costs of living and more choices available through streaming services.
Ann Davies
PC
Caerfyrddin
Discussed S4C's economic impact and the need for meaningful consultation within Wales.
Anna Sabine
LD
Frome and East Somerset
Supports the BBC as a publicly funded model of public service broadcasting. Advocates for sustainable funding settlements that guarantee independence from political interference and protect editorial integrity. Highlights the economic value and cultural significance of the BBC's creative output.
Tewkesbury
Stated that children’s content creators rely on income from the BBC, advocating for investment in future quality content.
Gosport
Called for a sustainable funding future for the BBC, questioned why certain options are not being considered in the charter review.
Iqbal Mohamed
Ind
Dewsbury and Batley
Highlighted serious issues regarding the BBC's impartiality concerning its coverage of Gaza and called for an end to partisan appointments within the organisation. Asked Kevin Bonavia if he agreed that there was empirical evidence regarding bias in BBC reporting and questioned why there has been no response from the BBC or the Government to a report by the Centre for Media Monitoring. Asked when or whether the Government and the BBC will respond to the Centre for Media Monitoring report.
James Naish
Lab
Rushcliffe
Asked if regional disparities should be addressed in the charter renewal process, agreeing with his colleague about the importance of funding for regional production and content creation.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
He expressed frustration with the current BBC model and highlighted issues such as biased reporting on Northern Ireland, Israel, and other moral values, arguing for an optional subscription service. Inquired whether constituents in Mr Campbell's constituency are also unsubscribing from the BBC due to a lack of confidence in its reporting accuracy.
John Lamont
Con
Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk
Illustrated concerns over constituents' lack of broadband connectivity impacting TV service access under a subscription model.
John McDonnell
Lab
Hayes and Harlington
Addressed funding cuts, governance issues, and the importance of an independent board for the BBC.
John Milne
LD
Horsham
Stresses the importance of the BBC in supporting emerging talent in the creative industry, beyond just its news output. Argues that removing the BBC would harm the entire media ecosystem.
John Slinger
Lab
Rugby
He supported Tom Rutland's stance, suggesting that those questioning the BBC may have ulterior motives regarding public discourse and democracy. He emphasized the importance of a trusted national broadcaster.
Jonathan Davies
Lab
Mid Derbyshire
Welcomes the opportunity provided by the Green Paper consultation. Emphasises that the BBC must retain its strong regional dimension and political impartiality, grow trustworthiness, invest in programme making to compete with streaming services, and be properly resourced.
Kevin Bonavia
Lab
Stevenage
Stressed that the BBC is a distinctly British service, highlighting its importance as a human organisation subject to high standards compared to other broadcasters. Highlighted the role of the national broadcaster in an age of misinformation, emphasising accountability and public trust.
Lee Anderson
Reform
Ashfield
Critiqued the BBC's compulsory payment system and alleged scandals involving its personalities, suggesting it should be a subscription service rather than a forced payment.
Gregory Campbell
DUP
East Londonderry
He provided specific examples of perceived bias in the BBC's coverage of Israel, including a fine imposed on Jeremy Bowen for entering a house without permission. He emphasized the need for accountability and unbiased reporting. Condemned recent coverage of events in Northern Ireland, highlighting that the BBC reported on context surrounding certain violent incidents but not others, demonstrating perceived bias.
Polly Billington
Lab
East Thanet
Discussed the importance of fair funding for the BBC to ensure its universality and impartiality, highlighting cuts in recent years that have weakened the organisation.
Rachael Maskell
Lab/Co-op
York Central
Called for a reset and fresh start for the BBC, emphasizing the importance of independence, robust regulation by Ofcom, and the role of the broadcaster as a training ground for future skills within the creative sector. Discussed the importance of accountability within the BBC framework.
Salford
Emphasised the need for proper funding to protect the BBC's public service broadcasting role, citing negative impacts of budget cuts on local and international coverage, as well as economic benefits in regions like Salford. Spoke powerfully about minority languages and issues relevant to her constituency. Emphasised the transformational impact of the BBC’s investment in Salford.
Richard Baker
Lab
Glenrothes and Mid Fife
Emphasized the importance of the BBC's investment in devolved nations for providing content that otherwise would not be available due to private media withdrawal, citing a doubling of spending to £100 million on programmes produced in Scotland.
Sarah Coombes
Lab
West Bromwich
Discussed the impact of BBC cuts on international broadcasting and local radio.
East Worthing and Shoreham
Acknowledged the importance of maintaining high editorial standards at the BBC.
Tom Rutland
Lab
East Worthing and Shoreham
He highlighted the economic value of the BBC and its role in providing trusted news, stressing that the broadcaster should remain independent and accountable. He was concerned about overreliance on commercial revenue and potential impacts on content creation. Pointed out the important role of the World Service, partly funded by the FCDO. Highlighted the BBC's significant investment in Salford.
Tonia Antoniazzi
Lab
Gower
Asked about the need for an inquiry into alleged inappropriate interference by politically appointed board members in BBC editorial matters, highlighting concerns over political influence and independence.
Torcuil Crichton
Lab
Na h-Eileanan an Iar
Welcomed the Government's Green Paper but criticised the disparity in funding for Gaelic and Welsh broadcasting, noting that BBC Alba received no UK government support while S4C receives £7.5 million annually.
Valerie Vaz
Lab
Walsall and Bloxwich
Asked if 47p a day is value for money given the range of services provided by the BBC.
Government Response
Stephanie Peacock
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
Government Response
Acknowledged the long history and vital role of the BBC. Addressed specific points raised by MPs regarding challenges faced by the organisation and its funding. Stated that the cost should be as low as possible while ensuring efficiency in operations. Emphasised the need for debate on sustainability, funding settlement, changing viewer habits, and scope during the charter review process. Welcomed contributions to the debate, assured that further opportunities will be provided, and highlighted the importance of public engagement through consultation.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.