← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Defence Procurement: Small and Medium-sized Enterprises

28 January 2025

Lead MP

Alan Strickland
Newton Aycliffe and Spennymoor
Lab

Responding Minister

Maria Eagle

Tags

Ukraine
Word Count: 9037
Other Contributors: 15

At a Glance

Alan Strickland raised concerns about defence procurement: small and medium-sized enterprises in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

We need to change how we think about defence procurement, adopting a proactive entrepreneurial approach that encourages innovative SMEs to contribute new ideas and technologies to tackle future military challenges.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Newton Aycliffe and Spennymoor
Opened the debate
Procurement is not usually a topic that gets pulses racing, but the threats posed to the UK and our allies certainly should. Technology has been rapidly altering the nature of warfare at an unprecedented pace, as seen in Ukraine with drone technology rewriting the rules of modern conflict. Central to responding to these challenges is using the defence industrial strategy to unleash British industry's inventiveness, ingenuity, and creativity.

Government Response

Maria Eagle
The Minister for Defence Procurement and Industry
Government Response
The Government has boosted spending this year by just under £3 billion in real terms, setting out a pathway to reach 2.5% of GDP on defence. The procurement system was described as 'broken', but changes are being made to respond more swiftly to the changing face of warfare and support SMEs. Discussed increasing SME involvement in procurement processes, acknowledged concerns about late payments and protested activities on university campuses. Emphasised the importance of ethical investment in defence for security reasons.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.