← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Energy Resilience

06 May 2025

Lead MP

Tom Collins
Worcester
Lab

Responding Minister

Michael Shanks

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 3548
Other Contributors: 4

At a Glance

Tom Collins raised concerns about energy resilience in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

He asked for consideration on how to ensure resilience against market-induced price instability and commercial failures, while also incorporating core features that function primarily in the public interest.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Worcester
Opened the debate
Tom Collins expressed concerns about the volatility and uncertainty of future energy conditions, highlighting the need for a robust electricity grid that can accommodate dispersed and unpredictable renewable generation. He emphasized the importance of storage in the new energy system and raised questions about digital communications potential single points of failure.

Government Response

Michael Shanks
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero
Government Response
Acknowledges the importance of maintaining UK's energy resilience through diversification, highlighting GB's reliable supply from multiple sources. Emphasises the role of storage as a flexibility tool in balancing supply and demand. Ofgem sets annual targets on customer interruptions and minutes lost. The Minister discussed the impact of storms like Storm Arwen and highlighted resilience measures, hydrogen's role in energy resilience, learning from incidents, interdependencies within systems, cross-Government work to enhance resilience, storage assets for clean power, and the Government's mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.