← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Changing Places Toilets: Capital Funding — [Sir Alec Shelbrooke in the Chair]

16 July 2026

Lead MP

Daniel Francis

Responding Minister

Nesil Caliskan

Tags

NHSLocal Government
Word Count: 10557
Other Contributors: 6

At a Glance

Daniel Francis raised concerns about changing places toilets: capital funding — [sir alec shelbrooke in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Mr. Francis calls on the government to introduce a new capital fund for older and smaller venues that do not meet current regulations for installation, as well as to work with the Changing Places consortium to upgrade older standard facilities. He also requests support in bringing forward modern software to improve accessibility planning tools.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
Mr. Francis is concerned about the slow growth of Changing Places toilets and the end of the previous funding scheme in March 2025. He highlights that while there are now 2,665 active and registered Changing Places toilets across the UK, this number has slowed due to a lack of capital funding. Mr. Francis also raises issues with vandalism at existing facilities and the need for better maintenance.

Government Response

Nesil Caliskan
Government Response
Welcomed the debate, recognizing the importance of accessible public toilets and highlighting the £30 million fund for over 400 new disabled toilet facilities in England. Acknowledged calls for a new capital fund pot but emphasized that local authorities are best placed to make decisions on facility provision. Promised to continue discussions with the consortium and other government departments to improve access to Changing Places toilets, including addressing issues in NHS hospitals and transport hubs.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.