← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Coastal Communities: Isolation and Hidden Deprivation

14 July 2026

Lead MP

Richard Quigley

Responding Minister

Nesil Caliskan

Tags

EconomyTaxationEmploymentParliamentary ProcedureChildren & Families
Word Count: 13456
Other Contributors: 25

At a Glance

Richard Quigley raised concerns about coastal communities: isolation and hidden deprivation in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Quigley asks the government to address the hidden deprivation and isolation faced by coastal communities, particularly the Isle of Wight, by ensuring fairer funding formulas that account for additional costs of living on an island. He requests recognition of the 'island premium', estimated at £380 per resident annually. The Government should develop a genuine coastal communities strategy that addresses the needs of these areas, including improved transport and digital connectivity to overcome geographical isolation. The right to guaranteed hours can compel businesses to offer those hours even during periods of poor weather, which is detrimental to seasonal work. Funding must recognise the pressures faced by ageing populations and vulnerable residents.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
Richard Quigley is concerned about the isolation and hidden deprivation in coastal communities, particularly on the Isle of Wight. He highlights challenges such as high ferry costs, rural classification leading to difficulties in service delivery, high levels of educational deprivation, higher average age population, and child poverty rates above national average. Quigley cites a 2024 report from the London School of Economics arguing that indifference contributes significantly to persistent challenges faced by seaside communities, and mentions a 'coastal excess' of disease as identified in a 2021 report. He raises issues regarding funding formulas which overlook additional costs for island life, leading to a £13 million annual shortfall for Isle of Wight council. Britain's coastal communities are among the most beautiful parts of our country, but behind this image lies a reality of isolation, hidden deprivation and lack of opportunity. Coastal areas have higher levels of deprivation than inland areas, lower rates of educational attainment, higher rates of disability and an older population. Businesses in these areas face higher costs, greater uncertainty, poor transport links and economic challenges. The House of Lords Select Committee on Regenerating Seaside Towns and Communities called for a dedicated coastal communities strategy back in 2019.

Government Response

Nesil Caliskan
Government Response
The Government recognise the importance of coastal communities and have allocated £6 billion for long-term investment through the Pride in Place programme. This funding has benefited over 50 coastal communities collectively, with more than £1 billion invested. The minister acknowledged that while the programme is important, it alone will not solve all issues faced by coastal areas. She highlighted several initiatives such as Mission Coastal and local regeneration funds aimed at improving education and economic growth in disadvantaged coastal regions. Regarding employment and transport, she noted the importance of flexible working but emphasised existing legal protections for employees in seasonal industries. The minister also discussed plans to develop a new transport poverty tool and the impact of abolishing furnished holiday lets tax regime on short-term lettings. Health services were addressed with an emphasis on reducing health inequalities and ensuring joined-up service delivery.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.