← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Community Infrastructure Levy: Homeowners
29 April 2026
Lead MP
Jeremy Hunt
Godalming and Ash
Con
Responding Minister
Matthew Pennycook
Tags
Standards & Ethics
Word Count: 8979
Other Contributors: 7
At a Glance
Jeremy Hunt raised concerns about community infrastructure levy: homeowners in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
I urge the Government to reform CIL legislation to disti [5D [K distinguish between commercial developers and householders, provide clear g [1D [K guidance for local councils not to charge homeowners, establish a mechanism [9D [K mechanism for redress and correct mistakes after liability notices, and spe [3D [K specify that interest from unspent CIL should go back into the CIL account. [8D [K account.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
I am concerned about the profound life-changing cons [4D [K consequences for ordinary families across the country due to the Community [K Infrastructure Levy (CIL). There are now more than 100 known cases of homeo [5D [K homeowners facing unexpected CIL charges, ranging from £26,000 to £235,000. [9D [K £235,000. Some councils, like Waverley in my constituency, have charged ove [3D [K over £550 per square metre, one of the highest rates in the country. Famili [6D [K Families are being forced to sell or remortgage their homes and face immens [6D [K immense financial burdens alongside stress and uncertainty.
Gareth Bacon
Con
Orpington
Critiqued the inconsistent enforcement of the Commun [6D [K Community Infrastructure Levy on private homeowners, highlighting its finan [5D [K financial burden and lack of exemptions for minor home improvements. Mentio [6D [K Mentioned specific cases where residents faced exorbitant bills with no rig [3D [K right to appeal. Called for better guidance from the Government to local au [2D [K authorities on CIL enforcement.
Gideon Amos
Lib Dem
Taunton and Wellington
Mr Amos highlights that families are facing bills of [2D [K of £40,000 to £70,000 for missing forms. He criticises the Conservative cou [3D [K council administration for implementing the CIL charging schedule and calls [5D [K calls for changes in regulations. The right hon. Gentleman is correct that residents n [1D [K need redress, but the nature of errors or mistakes in charging can vary bet [3D [K between authorities. In West Berkshire, a procedural error was made, leadin [6D [K leading to different remedies.
Gregory Stafford
Con
Farnham and Bordon
The community infrastructure levy is intended to sup [3D [K support growth through infrastructure, but in parts of Farnham and Bordon t [1D [K the promise is broken. £30 million has been collected and left unspent by W [1D [K Waverley borough council, with interest accruing at £125,000 a month absorb [6D [K absorbed into general spending rather than ringfenced for infrastructure. H [1D [K Homeowners making changes to their properties are being aggressively pursue [6D [K pursued and charged exorbitant rates; in Farnham the rate is £547.17 per sq [2D [K square metre, rising to nearly £570 in Haslemere. Residents face CIL liabil [6D [K liabilities of nearly £1 million without support from the council. Mr Stafford corrects a previous statement that CIL w [1D [K was introduced by Conservatives in Waverley, noting it was implemented by t [1D [K the Liberal Democrats. He calls for more flexible systems like those used e [1D [K elsewhere.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Jim Shannon highlighted the cautionary tale from Nor [3D [K Northern Ireland, which operates without a CIL-style levy and relies on bes [3D [K bespoke section 76 agreements. He noted that this approach has led to a mul [3D [K multibillion-pound funding gap for infrastructure in Northern Ireland.
John Milne
Lib Dem
Horsham
My constituent Ruth had to pay a £38,000 CIL charge [K due to her husband's Alzheimer's preventing him from submitting correct for [3D [K forms. The Government cannot intervene because the rules were followed tech [4D [K technically, despite the injustice. The CIL rules are too inflexible and va [2D [K vague.
Kit Malthouse
Con
North West Hampshire
Kit Malthouse supported his right hon. Friend's illu [4D [K illustration of injustices caused by CIL and discussed the macroeconomic im [2D [K impact, noting that small builders have been heavily impacted since the cra [3D [K crash in 2008.
Richard Foord
Lib Dem
Honiton and Sidmouth
Richard Foord shared the view that when CIL was intr [4D [K introduced, it was not meant to penalise people adding extensions or seekin [6D [K seeking to self-build but rather as a levy on large-scale infrastructure to [2D [K to reinvest into the community. My hon. Friend reminds the House that his colleague, [10D [K colleague, Mr Dillon, tabled a new clause on CIL guidance for the English D [1D [K Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, which was not accepted by the Go [2D [K Government. He suggests looking at other legislative opportunities to addre [5D [K address these issues.
Government Response
Matthew Pennycook
Government Response
The Government recognise concerns about CIL liabili [7D [K liabilities applying to householder and self-build developments. The curren [6D [K current balance between transparency, certainty, and consistency has not al [2D [K always been achieved in practice. Therefore, the Government intend to consu [5D [K consult on proposals to amend the CIL regulations to improve the process fo [2D [K for obtaining exemptions. These proposals aim to minimise procedural errors [6D [K errors and prevent significant unexpected charges for homeowners and self-b [6D [K self-builders while ensuring local planning authorities can properly admini [6D [K administer CIL. The consultation will be published before the summer recess [6D [K recess.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.