← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Junior Doctors’ Foundation Programme

22 April 2026

Lead MP

Peter Prinsley
Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket
Lab

Responding Minister

Stephen Kinnock

Tags

NHSEmploymentChildren & Families
Word Count: 10992
Other Contributors: 6

At a Glance

Peter Prinsley raised concerns about junior doctors’ foundation programme in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Prinsley calls for reforms to the recruitment process an [2D [K and suggests returning to a firm-based model for the first year of training [8D [K training arranged by medical schools rather than a centralised national alg [3D [K algorithm. He also recommends guaranteeing all UK graduates a foundation po [2D [K post with full details provided at least 12 weeks before the start date.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket
Opened the debate
Dr Peter Prinsley is concerned about the current fou [3D [K foundation programme for junior doctors, stating that only 44% of resident [K doctors are satisfied with their clinical training and 26% feel ready to mo [2D [K move on to the next step. He highlights the issues with the preference info [4D [K informed allocation system which leads to a 'crazy foundation lottery' send [4D [K sending young doctors to cities where they know no one. Prinsley also menti [5D [K mentions that medical students in relationships face unfairness due to link [4D [K linked applications, further complicating their career progression.

Government Response

Stephen Kinnock
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under the chairmanship of [2D [K of Mrs Barker. The UK foundation programme, a central part of becoming a do [2D [K doctor, supports newly qualified doctors in developing clinical and profess [7D [K professional skills necessary for safe and effective care. Resident doctors [7D [K doctors have expressed concerns about their training experience, which we a [1D [K are committed to improving through phase 1 of the medical training review t [1D [K that made 11 recommendations focused on four key priorities: flexible train [5D [K training, bridging service and training, ending recruitment bottlenecks, an [2D [K and rewarding teams where doctors feel valued. The workforce plan will be p [1D [K published this spring, after extensive engagement with partners and stakeho [7D [K stakeholders. The Government delivered fast-track legislation to ensure [K UK medical graduates are prioritised for foundation and specialty training [K places, confirming all eligible UK medical graduates will be offered a plac [4D [K place on the programme this year. The PIA system introduced in 2024 has see [3D [K seen significant improvements; currently, 82% of applicants get their first [5D [K first preference up from 71% last year. We remain committed to reviewing an [2D [K and improving this system. The Government also supports measures for res [3D [K resident doctors' working conditions, including an improved exception repor [5D [K reporting system that ensures fair compensation for additional work and rat [3D [K rationalising statutory and mandatory training to reduce unnecessary burden [6D [K burden. Significant progress has been made with a 29% pay increase for resi [4D [K resident doctors, addressing years of underpayment due to the previous gove [4D [K government's neglect. The Government acknowledges public support for res [3D [K resident doctors' actions is eroding, urging them to return to the table fo [2D [K for constructive dialogue. We remain committed to improving working lives a [1D [K and prospects for resident doctors while ensuring an effective foundation p [1D [K programme.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.