← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Prison Officers: Mandatory Body Armour — [Clive Betts in the Chair]

26 March 2026

Lead MP

Julian Lewis
New Forest East
Con

Responding Minister

Jake Richards

Tags

Policing & ResourcesEmployment
Word Count: 10794
Other Contributors: 10

At a Glance

Julian Lewis raised concerns about prison officers: mandatory body armour — [clive betts in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Minister is asked to accept that all prison officers deserve protection from violence regardless of their work location and consider rolling out mandatory body armour. Additionally, the Minister is urged to ensure any new body armour procured meets high safety standards and avoids causing physical problems for male and female officers.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

New Forest East
Opened the debate
The number of assaults on prison staff in England and Wales has nearly trebled from 3,640 to 10,605 between 2014 and the end of 2024. Claire Lewis, a constituent of Gill Furness, was severely stabbed while working at HMP Frankland in 2010, leading her to advocate for mandatory body armour. Her petition gathered over 32,500 signatures. The announcement last September that 10,000 prison guards would be given stab-proof vests and 500 tasers were insufficient as many staff remain unprotected.

Government Response

Jake Richards
Government Response
The Government acknowledges the need for prison officer protection but emphasizes that rolling out mandatory body armour is complex. The Minister highlights ongoing efforts such as equipping officers with PAVA spray and tasers, training programs, and secure storage solutions. He assures that staff safety is a top priority and commits to further discussion on data publication.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.