← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Sudden Unexpected Death in Childhood

24 March 2026

Lead MP

Andy MacNae
Rossendale and Darwen
Lab

Responding Minister

Sharon Hodgson

Tags

NHSMental HealthChildren & Families
Word Count: 13081
Other Contributors: 13

At a Glance

Andy MacNae raised concerns about sudden unexpected death in childhood in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I ask the Government to lead the search for answers through a coordinated national plan that includes research, awareness raising, public information improvements, faster post-mortem processes, and bereavement support services. This would establish strategic objectives with clear timelines, milestones, and measurable outcomes. I ask the Minister to develop a national plan for Sudden Unexpected Death in Childhood (SUDC), formulate it with Ministers working with officials and scientific experts as a matter of urgency; commit to regular reporting at a minimum of every two years; ensure clear, accessible information is available through NHS websites and other portals; and implement recommendations from the paediatric and perinatal pathology workforce report quickly.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Rossendale and Darwen
Opened the debate
I am concerned about the sudden unexplained death of children, which is the fourth leading cause of death for children aged one to 18. Around 120 such deaths occur each year in the UK, leaving families devastated with no answers or closure. Cases like Frankie Grogan's highlight the need for national leadership and co-ordination. The sudden and unexpected death of a child between the ages of one and 18, where no cause can be found even after investigation, is one of the leading categories of death for children aged one to four in England and Wales. Sarah Hall shared the story of a family from her constituency whose 13-month-old grandson died suddenly without any warning signs or build-up. The family endured over a year of silence followed by distressing communications, faced inconsistent information, and experienced severe mental health challenges due to the lack of clarity.

Government Response

Sharon Hodgson
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir John. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Rossendale and Darwen for securing this debate during SUDC Awareness Month. I acknowledge the courage of Frankie's family in turning their loss into a call for understanding and change. I recognise calls from Members for a national plan, which is why we are strengthening pathology services, ensuring high-quality bereavement support, and growing research on SUDC. My hon. Friend Sally Jameson asked about bereavement leave, and my hon. Friend Mr Rand raised the issue of police and paramedic training; I will raise both issues with relevant Departments. Regarding information on SUDC being taken down from the NHS website, I have already asked officials to investigate and explore opportunities for signposting. Pathology waiting times can add distress for families, but we are addressing this with a national programme to strengthen perinatal and paediatric pathology services, allocating more than £2 million-worth of additional funding. Genomic testing is available through the NHS genomic medicine service and decisions about its appropriateness are made after post-mortem examinations by specialist multidisciplinary teams. We remain open to funding high-quality research into SUDC through the National Institute for Health and Care Research, welcoming applications on any aspect of child health, including SUDC. I am encouraged to see that the University of Bristol has secured funding from SUDC UK for the Pioneer SUDC study which will help shape future research questions and contribute to deeper learning in this area. We are committed to working with partners to ensure bereaved families receive the compassion and support they deserve.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.