← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
NATO and the High Arctic — [Dr Rupa Huq in the Chair]
04 March 2026
Lead MP
Alex Ballinger
Halesowen
Lab
Responding Minister
Louise Jones
Tags
DefenceEconomyClimateForeign Affairs
Word Count: 9803
Other Contributors: 8
At a Glance
Alex Ballinger raised concerns about nato and the high arctic — [dr rupa huq in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
When will the defence investment plan be published? Do we have sufficient ships suitable and available to operate credibly in the north Atlantic and respond to the serious crisis in the Middle East at the same time? What steps are the Government taking bilaterally and through NATO to reassure Denmark and strengthen stability around Greenland while making it clear that sovereignty is not negotiable and that influence operations will be resisted?
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The High Arctic matters due to climate change extending operating seasons and increasing strategic interest in shipping, minerals, and energy. Russia's military presence is growing, and the Royal Navy has seen a 30% increase in Russian vessels threatening UK waters over the past two years. NATO's responsibilities have expanded with the addition of Finland and Sweden, and there is increasing undersea competition and vulnerability. The UK faces concurrent pressures in other theatres, such as deployments to the Middle East, and must ensure it can deploy ships without hollowing out its commitments to other parts of the world.
Al Pinkerton
Lib Dem
Surrey Heath
Al Pinkerton emphasized the geopolitical significance of the Arctic region due to climate change and the opening of new maritime routes. He highlighted the strategic importance of the Greenland-Iceland-UK gap for NATO's security and the need for the UK to deepen its commitment to Arctic security. He expressed concern over the US's aggressive stance towards Greenland and called on the Government to unequivocally state that British soil and facilities would never be used to support an invasion of Greenland. He also questioned the Government's plans to strengthen defence co-operation with Arctic allies and the future procurement reflecting strategic concerns.
Amanda Martin
Lab
Portsmouth North
Ms Martin discussed her recent visit to northern Norway as part of the armed forces parliamentary scheme, highlighting the strategic importance of the High North for NATO and British security. She mentioned the roles of the HMS Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales in Arctic operations and emphasized the need for readiness, welfare, and sustained investment in equipment and personnel. She concluded by asking how to ensure that troops receive the best possible soft materials for Arctic conditions.
Ben Obese-Jecty
Con
Huntingdon
I share concern about difficult decisions regarding capability deployment across multiple fronts including the High North, Ukraine, and the Middle East.
David Reed
Con
Exmouth and Exeter East
The hon. Member for Halesowen questioned why the Minister for the Armed Forces was not present, noting that the Member for Exmouth and Exeter East had never been to Norway and therefore was not a proper bootneck. He agreed that the Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) was a vital alliance for operations in the High North. David Reed highlighted the strategic importance of the High North in great power competition, emphasizing Russia's militarization, US strategic recalibration, and China's expansion. He commended the UK's strengthening of cooperation with Norway and the Royal Marines' training in Norway, but questioned the lack of a refreshed stand-alone High North defence strategy. Reed called for clearer objectives and capabilities tailored to the theatre, and expressed concerns about the UK's readiness to sustain a meaningful security presence in the High North.
Graeme Downie
Lab
Dunfermline and Dollar
I thank my hon. Friend for leading a debate on the importance of the High North and Arctic, and I emphasise the significance of partnerships such as the joint expeditionary force for the protection of undersea cables.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Jim Shannon thanked Alex Ballinger for leading the debate, emphasizing the importance of the High Arctic for UK security and economic wellbeing. He praised the Government's commitment to the defence industry in Northern Ireland and the country's cyber-security capabilities. Shannon highlighted the significance of the Greenland-Iceland-UK gap and the need for NATO support to monitor submarine activity and protect undersea infrastructure. He also questioned the adequacy of current defence spending and the extent of UK-Ireland cooperation in securing undersea cables, expressing concern about the perception of the UK's maritime capability.
Dwyfor Meirionnydd
I visited Nuuk in Greenland and discussed NATO and historical agreements, suggesting that the UK should call for a consulate in Greenland to develop future geo-significant relationships. Concerned about the risk of short-termism in democracy, highlighting that climate change could alter access to key rare earth minerals and shipping lanes in the far north within 30 years. Liz Saville-Roberts highlighted that many European countries are establishing consulates in the High Arctic alongside China and the United States, suggesting this as an effective use of Government funds.
Richard Foord
Lib Dem
Honiton and Sidmouth
Mr Foord intervened, expressing gratitude for the debate and commenting on the political leadership in the US and UK, suggesting that the current US President is no Franklin D. Roosevelt. Richard Foord inquired whether Denmark's pledge to increase defence spending to 3% of GDP is a good example for the United Kingdom to follow.
Government Response
Louise Jones
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Dr Huq. I am grateful to my hon. and gallant Friend the Member for Halesowen (Alex Ballinger) for initiating this debate on the high Arctic and its increasing importance to our security—an incredibly important topic. The UK has a long and storied history in the High North, and for some 50 years the Royal Marines have practised Arctic warfare alongside our Norwegian allies. As the threat from Russia has cast an increasingly long shadow over Europe, our High North capabilities have grown only more important, with High North deployments of Royal Marines up 40%, with year-round cold-weather operations. The reality is that we have a frontline with Russia in the North Atlantic, and the Russian threat is higher than it has been for decades. Russia is an increasing threat to our critical underwater infrastructure, and Putin is rapidly re-establishing military presence in the region. The Arctic is warming up four times faster than the global average, and the strategic defence review projects the region to be ice-free each summer by 2040, opening new routes, trade dynamics and flash points. Spearheading our capabilities is our littoral response group north, which is our specialised Royal Navy task group that deploys across the north Atlantic, the Baltic and the High North, with dedicated personnel, ships and helicopters to project power and respond to crises. We have also launched Atlantic Bastion, which is our groundbreaking programme to protect the UK from Russian undersea threats using an AI-powered network of sensors. We are working ever more closely with our nine partner nations that make up the joint expeditionary force. Finland and Sweden's accession has transformed NATO's northern posture, meaning that seven of the eight Arctic states are now NATO allies. The UK is playing a full part in NATO's Arctic sentry mission, which is enhancing NATO's posture in the Arctic and High North. We have also worked closely with the Finnish military, including through NATO's Exercise Dynamic Front, with the British Army conducting its first live firing of our Archer mobile howitzer on Finnish soil. Defence spending will rise to 2.6% in 2027, 3% in the next Parliament and 5% by 2035. Just as important as raising defence and security spending is making sure that we continue to pursue a NATO-first defence policy. We are a Government who are delivering the largest sustained increase in defence spending since the cold war, to keep Britain secure at home and strong abroad.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.