← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Funeral Premises: Environmental Health Inspections

03 March 2026

Lead MP

Mark Sewards
Leeds South West and Morley
Lab

Responding Minister

Alison McGovern

Tags

NHSSocial CareEconomyMental HealthLocal Government
Word Count: 3662
Other Contributors: 4

At a Glance

Mark Sewards raised concerns about funeral premises: environmental health inspections in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Sewards asks the Minister to assess the Fuller inquiry's recommendation for a statutory regulatory regime for funeral directors and to collate information from the 2024 inspections. He also urges the Minister to consider utilising local authorities or existing trade bodies to bridge the gap before full statutory regulation can be implemented.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Leeds South West and Morley
Opened the debate
Mark Sewards is concerned about the lack of regulation in the funeral sector, citing cases of funeral directors failing to treat remains with dignity and respect. He mentions the case of Florrie's Army, which mishandled the remains of babies, and highlights the need for environmental health inspections to build public trust. Sewards notes that while local authorities conducted inspections in 2024, they failed to identify problems that later came to light, raising questions about their effectiveness. He stresses that the issue is compounded by the lack of routine checks and minimum standards for funeral homes, making it easier to set up a funeral home than a burger van.

Government Response

Alison McGovern
Government Response
As ever, Sir Roger, it is a pleasure to serve under your chairship. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Leeds South West and Morley on introducing the debate and thank all Members who have participated in it. First and foremost, I thank my hon. Friend's constituents for their bravery to seek support from their Member of Parliament, meet with Ministers and try to make a difference for other families. The loss of a loved one is one of the most difficult things to go through in life, and we want to make sure that our loved ones are kept safe and treated with dignity after death, wherever and however they are cared for. The independent Fuller inquiry published its phase 2 report in July, which found serious weaknesses and inconsistencies across settings, making 75 recommendations, including the introduction of statutory regulation for all settings that care for the deceased. The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has accepted 11 recommendations in full and 43 in principle, subject to further work, leaving 21 under consideration. The Government will respond to the report in full by the summer. The Government needs to strike the right balance between boosting public assurance and getting it right for the more than 6,500 funeral providers, many of which are small family firms. The vast majority of funeral directors provide compassionate, professional care, with 85% of providers being members of a trade body offering guidance, codes of practice and voluntary inspection. The Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care is working closely with the NHS, local authorities, the Human Tissue Authority, the Care Quality Commission, and other partners to examine how robust and consistent standards can be applied across all settings. The Government is considering the possible role of local authorities in the future, but no automatic assumption is being made. The Government will carefully consider the potential regulation and work across the ministerial team to make sure that the recommendations are taken in the serious way they deserve.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.