← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Community Cohesion

03 March 2026

Lead MP

John Slinger
Rugby
Lab

Responding Minister

Miatta Fahnbulleh

Tags

Asylum & RefugeesTaxationEmploymentForeign AffairsAgriculture & Rural AffairsStandards & EthicsMental HealthLocal Government
Word Count: 13256
Other Contributors: 13

At a Glance

John Slinger raised concerns about community cohesion in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Slinger asked the Minister to update the House on the work being done by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to address issues related to community cohesion. Savage calls on the Government to fund local groups, support community ownership of energy, land, and assets, invest in youth services and intergenerational spaces, involve community voices in planning decisions, restore trust in environmental regulation, and devolve power to local communities. Leigh Ingham asks the Government to take steps to ensure that towns like Stafford are supported with real investment and opportunity, rather than becoming targets for those who seek to inflame resentment and prejudice for political gain. Khan asks the Minister to address the funding issue for Birmingham Perry Barr, arguing that the constituency should receive Pride in Place funding given its high levels of deprivation.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Rugby
Opened the debate
John Slinger is concerned about the deteriorating sense of community cohesion in the UK, particularly in Rugby, where he represents. He highlighted the impact of technology and social media on human interaction, citing that 83% of the population now lives in urban areas, leading to a sense of alienation. He also expressed worry about the misuse of flags and the impact of divisive rhetoric from figures like Elon Musk and Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, noting that these have left constituents feeling scared and intimidated. Roz Savage is concerned about the weakening of community cohesion in the UK, citing rising mistrust, loneliness, and anger. She highlights the negative impacts of infrastructure failures and unmanaged growth, and the erosion of trust in public services and the voting system. She mentions the example of Stronger South Cotswolds, an initiative in her constituency aimed at fostering connection and resilience through four pillars: food and farming, health and wellbeing, flood resilience and water issues, and community energy and nature conservation. She notes the importance of local legends and community initiatives in delivering services and fostering relationships across different backgrounds. Leigh Ingham is concerned about the impact of economic pressures and global tensions on community cohesion in Stafford. She recalls the 2001 race riots in Burnley and emphasises the importance of community cohesion as the difference between a town that can pull together during tough times and one that fractures. She highlights the importance of public trust, dialogue, and leadership in maintaining cohesion, and cites the third-worst cuts to youth services in Staffordshire as an example of the economic pressures faced by the community. Ayoub Khan is concerned about the damaging impact of political language and misinformation on community cohesion in Birmingham. He mentions the bin strikes and the Maccabi Tel Aviv saga, where legitimate concerns were smeared as extremism. Khan highlights the importance of the Hillsborough law for transparency and honesty in public life. He also points out the neglect and deprivation faced by his constituency, Birmingham Perry Barr, which has been left behind in Pride in Place funding despite high levels of deprivation.

Government Response

Miatta Fahnbulleh
Government Response
Emphasised the importance of social cohesion, acknowledged the rising tide of hate and division, and discussed the government's response including the Pride in Place programme to empower local communities to invest in their priorities. Highlighted three key strands of the government's approach: building confident communities, strengthening integration for migrants, and tackling extremism online and in communities. Announced further rollout of Pride in Place funding to 40 areas considering deprivation and cohesion, and outlined the government's commitment to supporting local authorities in closing asylum hotels and providing accommodation in a community-consented manner.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.