← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Power to Cancel Local Elections — [David Mundell in the Chair]

02 March 2026

Lead MP

Jamie Stone
Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross
Lib Dem

Responding Minister

Alison McGovern

Tags

EconomyDemocracy & ElectionsLocal Government
Word Count: 10008
Other Contributors: 9

At a Glance

Jamie Stone raised concerns about power to cancel local elections — [david mundell in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Stone calls on the Government to provide stronger safeguards and greater transparency where postponement is proposed. He also urges the Government to reconsider the concentration of discretion in the hands of a single Minister.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross
Opened the debate
Jamie Stone is concerned about the potential undermining of democratic accountability and public trust due to the postponement or cancellation of scheduled local elections. The petition has attracted over 150,000 signatures and highlights the importance of regular elections in ensuring that decisions are subject to scrutiny and renewal. Stone emphasizes the significance of independent bodies like the Electoral Commission and the Electoral Reform Society, which warn that postponements can create difficulties for voters, campaigners, and administrators, and can weaken accountability. He also notes that some councillors could serve for up to seven years without facing the electorate, which is a matter of concern.

Government Response

Alison McGovern
Government Response
Acknowledged the concerns raised by petitioners and expressed the importance of democratic legitimacy. Discussed the inefficiencies and costs associated with the two-tier system and the benefits of unitary councils. Addressed the legal considerations and the decision to revoke the postponement of elections. Mentioned the government's commitment to support councils in delivering reorganisation effectively and the potential savings from unitary authorities. Highlighted the government's provision of £63 million in capacity funding and the commitment to supporting safe and effective elections. Emphasized the long-term resilience of local government and the benefits of unitary authorities in terms of economic growth and integrated public services.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.