← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Power to Cancel Local Elections — [David Mundell in the Chair]
02 March 2026
Lead MP
Jamie Stone
Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross
Lib Dem
Responding Minister
Alison McGovern
Tags
EconomyDemocracy & ElectionsLocal Government
Word Count: 10008
Other Contributors: 9
At a Glance
Jamie Stone raised concerns about power to cancel local elections — [david mundell in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
Stone calls on the Government to provide stronger safeguards and greater transparency where postponement is proposed. He also urges the Government to reconsider the concentration of discretion in the hands of a single Minister.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Jamie Stone is concerned about the potential undermining of democratic accountability and public trust due to the postponement or cancellation of scheduled local elections. The petition has attracted over 150,000 signatures and highlights the importance of regular elections in ensuring that decisions are subject to scrutiny and renewal. Stone emphasizes the significance of independent bodies like the Electoral Commission and the Electoral Reform Society, which warn that postponements can create difficulties for voters, campaigners, and administrators, and can weaken accountability. He also notes that some councillors could serve for up to seven years without facing the electorate, which is a matter of concern.
Andrew Rosindell
Con
Romford
The hon. Member argued that cancelling elections is fundamentally dishonest and should only be done in extreme situations. He highlighted the lack of a democratic mandate for the structure of local government in Havering, which is currently part of the Greater London Authority. He called for a referendum to decide whether Havering should be a unitary authority or part of the new Greater Essex. He praised the petition that led to the debate and expressed confidence in a significant change in the local council.
David Simmonds
Con
Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
David Simmonds expressed concerns over the Government's failure to deliver on their devolution priority programme, leading to cancellations of local elections. He criticised the lack of direction and chaos in the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, which has left local government leaders in a difficult position. Simmonds questioned why the Government had reversed their decision to cancel elections despite legal advice previously indicating that it was lawful. He also raised concerns about the £63 million 'capacity' grant and the guidance provided for its use.
Gavin Robinson
SDLP
Belfast West
Gavin Robinson responded to Mark Francois, emphasizing the importance of democratic rights for local councillors and the need for people to have a say in who runs their services through elections. He highlighted the responsibilities of local government, including planning, housing, and social care, and questioned why local councillors should not have to renew their contract of employment via the ballot box, similar to Members of Parliament.
Gideon Amos
Lib Dem
Taunton and Wellington
Gideon Amos criticised the government's decision to cancel local elections, stating it contravened the democratic mandates given to elected councillors. He called for full disclosure of legal and other advice relied upon by the government and questioned the legality of the 2021 election postponement in Cumbria, Carlisle, South Lakeland, and Somerset. He also raised concerns over the Government's top-down reorganisation of councils and the potential impact on electoral services officers whose district councils were lined up for abolition.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Jim Shannon intervened to support the notion that elections are crucial for communities to hold leaders accountable and set local priorities. He emphasised the importance of not denying people their right to vote.
John Milne
Lib Dem
Horsham
John Milne criticised the Government's handling of the local government reorganisation process, describing it as shambolic and highlighting the distress caused by the decision to allow councils to postpone their elections. He supported the petitioners and urged the Minister to amend legislation to remove the Secretary of State's right to cancel elections.
Mark Francois
Con
Rayleigh and Wickford
Mark Francois, a former local councillor in Basildon, stated that the Government's decision to hold local elections is beneficial, especially for Labour-led councils in Basildon, Southend, and Thurrock, which will now face the electorate regarding their poor performance. Mark Francois provides historical context by mentioning that a general election was held in Britain in July 1945 during the second world war, arguing that local elections could be held this May in peacetime. Mark Francois criticised the government's decision to postpone mayoral elections in Essex to May 2028, arguing that it leads to an unelected combined authority and a lack of public demand for a mayor. He questioned the logic behind moving from one two-tier system to another, noting that previous attempts at local government reform failed due to disagreements. Francois also called for the results of the consultation on local government reorganisation to be published before the elections to ensure transparency. He advised the Minister to abandon the local government reforms in Essex, describing them as a shambles. He pointed out that the Government's plans would create two tiers of local government replacing two different tiers, arguing that it is a fantasy to claim otherwise.
Nigel Farage
Reform
Clacton
Nigel Farage highlighted the issue of local elections being cancelled or delayed, arguing that this undermines the principle of 'no taxation without representation'. He mentioned that 153,000 people had signed a petition and that 4.6 million people would vote due to a judicial review. Farage argued that the power to cancel elections should be subject to primary legislation and open debate in Parliament.
Will Forster
Lib Dem
Woking
Will Forster expressed concern about the unreasonably lost right to vote in Surrey county council's elections due to local government reorganisation. He questioned the legality of the postponement of elections and urged the Government to regain trust by publishing legal advice and preventing future cancellation of local elections. The hon. Member highlighted the issue of a new council called West Surrey, which includes only one sixth of the area in south Middlesex. He expressed concern about the council inheriting over £4 billion of debt from former Conservative administrations, noting that this is a more pressing issue than the council's name.
Government Response
Alison McGovern
Government Response
Acknowledged the concerns raised by petitioners and expressed the importance of democratic legitimacy. Discussed the inefficiencies and costs associated with the two-tier system and the benefits of unitary councils. Addressed the legal considerations and the decision to revoke the postponement of elections. Mentioned the government's commitment to support councils in delivering reorganisation effectively and the potential savings from unitary authorities. Highlighted the government's provision of £63 million in capacity funding and the commitment to supporting safe and effective elections. Emphasized the long-term resilience of local government and the benefits of unitary authorities in terms of economic growth and integrated public services.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.