← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Foster Care: Recruitment and Retention
24 February 2026
Lead MP
Rebecca Smith
South West Devon
Con
Responding Minister
Josh MacAlister
Tags
Social CareTaxationEmploymentChildren & FamiliesLocal Government
Word Count: 4341
Other Contributors: 2
At a Glance
Rebecca Smith raised concerns about foster care: recruitment and retention in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The lead MP urged the Government to give independent fostering agencies a seat at the table during the regionalisation process, fix the postcode lottery for foster care fees, and learn from successful local authority provision examples like Plymouth city council. She also suggested that the Minister visit Plymouth to see its initiatives in action.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The number of foster carers in England fell by 12% from 2021 to March 2025, resulting in 1,140 fewer placements available for children in care. The lead MP highlighted the importance of partnerships between local authorities and independent fostering agencies (IFAs), noting that IFAs are more effective at recruitment and retention, less expensive, and offer high-quality care as evidenced by Ofsted ratings. However, she pointed out that the Government's regional care co-operatives do not properly acknowledge the role of IFAs, leading to missed opportunities for collaboration.
Alex Easton
Ind
North Down
Does the hon. Member agree that there should be greater recognition of foster carers as part of the professional team around the child, and that fully promoting a team-around-the-child model in which social workers, foster carers and therapists are regarded and treated as equal partners would enhance the experience and outcomes for children in care?
Rachael Maskell
Lab Co-op
York Central
Feedback from foster carers in York has highlighted the differential in the sums of money they receive for Staying Put and for foster caring, which makes it really difficult for them to decide whether to maintain that home—that safe place—for a child or to push the child out of the home. Does the hon. Member agree that those resources should be equalised? Could the Minister say a little more about how foster carers from within families will be handled in this process? That is really important. Also, how will the reunification process work, so that we can reunite a child with their birth family?
Government Response
Josh MacAlister
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Jeremy. I thank both the hon. Member for South West Devon (Rebecca Smith) for securing the debate and other Members for their interventions. Since my appointment last September, I have made renewing our fostering system my No. 1 priority as the Minister for Children and Families. Through extensive engagement and discussion, we have pulled together a bold plan to create 10,000 additional foster care places by the end of this Parliament, acknowledging that foster care numbers are in decline with a 12% drop since 2019. The total number of inquiries made last year only saw 7,300 newly approved foster carers despite 150,000 inquiries, and 59% of fostering assessments take more than six months. This pressure has led to a 24% increase in children living in residential care between 2020 and 2025, with spending on residential care doubling to £3.7 billion over the same period. Our reforms include renewing local authority fostering teams and expanding fostering hubs that take on the full end-to-end process, creating new regional care co-operatives, launching a digital platform to speed up approvals, changing standards for kinship carers and foster approval systems, scaling and supporting innovations like Mockingbird and Room Makers programmes, rewriting the rulebook around fostering, and encouraging partnerships between fostering hubs and independent fostering associations. We aim to ensure that every child who could thrive in foster care has the option of a home to grow up in with love, stability, and opportunity.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.