← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Pectus Deformity Treatment: NHS Funding

24 November 2020

Lead MP

Simon Clarke
Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
Con

Responding Minister

Edward Argar

Tags

NHSTaxation
Word Count: 4225
Other Contributors: 1

At a Glance

Simon Clarke raised concerns about pectus deformity treatment: nhs funding in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I ask the government to reconsider its wider policy on pectus deformity treatment urgently. While such a review is underway, I propose establishing a facility for surgeons to discuss evidence for severe cases and allow selected centres to perform operations, reporting findings in a registry to inform future policies.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
Opened the debate
I am concerned about the lack of NHS-funded treatment for pectus excavatum, a condition that has severely impacted a young girl named Autumn Bradley in my constituency. The current NHS policy does not allow for surgery even in severe cases like Autumn's, despite it being widely available and effective elsewhere in the UK and internationally. This decision is based on outdated literature reviews and excludes crucial evidence about the physical benefits of surgery. Autumn's surgeon, Mr Dunning, estimates that approximately 50 patients a year in England suffer from life-limiting symptoms due to this policy.

Government Response

Edward Argar
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms McVey. I am grateful for the opportunity to discuss funding for pectus deformity treatment. The Government supports the NHS with £33.9 billion in additional investment by 2023-24. While treatment is free at the point of need, clinical commissioning groups must use their funds responsibly. Surgery for severe physical complications from pectus excavatum was reviewed and found insufficient evidence to routinely commission. However, patients can access it through individual funding requests (IFR) if deemed clinically necessary. The minister acknowledged the case of Autumn, a constituent of the Member for Bury South, expressing sympathy and admiration for her courage in speaking out. He promised to convey the request for a review with additional evidence consideration but could not commit to a specific NHS response due to its independence. The minister offered to meet the MP again if helpful and highlighted ongoing work to build the evidence base for future commissioning decisions.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.