← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Moorland Burning
18 November 2020
Lead MP
Olivia Blake
Sheffield Hallam
Lab
Responding Minister
Rebecca Pow
Tags
EconomyTaxationClimateAgriculture & Rural Affairs
Word Count: 9647
Other Contributors: 9
At a Glance
Olivia Blake raised concerns about moorland burning in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The Government must announce an immediate ban on moorland burning and restore our peatlands to their natural habitats. They should also commit to properly resourcing conservation bodies to monitor and clamp down on illegal burning, set a firm date for the burn ban to take effect, and implement Labour's plan for a national nature service.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The UK peatlands contain an estimated 3,200 million tonnes of carbon. Between the 1940s and present, there has been a sevenfold increase in burning on peatland in England alone. In Great Britain, between 2001 and 2011, burning increased at a rate of 11% per year. Burning peat bogs dries out peat soil, harming biodiversity and water quality, leading to higher carbon dioxide emissions equivalent to those from 140,000 cars annually. The dried peat also contributes to flooding issues, as seen in Fishlake near Doncaster where 90% of homes were flooded last year.
Edward Leigh
Con
Gainsborough
Critiqued the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds' campaign against grouse shooting and moorland burning, arguing that controlled burns are necessary for wildlife management. He highlighted the importance of gamekeepers in preserving biodiversity and criticised the RSPB's perceived political agenda.
Holly Lynch
Lab
Calder Valley
Ms Lynch highlighted the importance of moorland management for carbon storage, flood protection and wildfire prevention in Yorkshire. She noted that burning on grouse moors emits approximately 350,000 tonnes of CO2 annually according to the Committee on Climate Change and called for legislative action before year-end. She also brought up a recent visit to a moorland restoration project with the RSPB near Dove Stone reservoir, urging the Minister to publish the England peat strategy soon.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
I am concerned about the impact of banning moorland burning, as it is essential for conservation and management. I have personally planted over 3,500 trees on my land to support wildlife habitats. Moorland burning has been practised for thousands of years, locking away carbon in peat below, which helps protect carbon stores. Asked the Minister whether she might have conversations with organisations like the British Association for Shooting and Conservation and the Countryside Alliance to gauge opinions on managing the moors and form a policy that everyone could agree upon.
Owen Thompson
Lab
Carmarthen East and Dinefwr
Mr Owen Thompson highlighted the effect of muirburn on peatlands, which are critical for preserving biodiversity, minimising flood risk and fighting climate change. He noted that 6% of manmade CO2 emissions come from damage to peatlands and called for steps to protect them from deterioration. Research by the University of Leeds found that burning grouse moors degrades peatland habitat, releases climate-altering gases, reduces biodiversity, and increases flood risk.
Rachael Maskell
Lab Co-op
York Central
The frequency and height of flooding in York is worsening, with two floods this year. The city needs action on moorland burning to improve climate, biodiversity, water regulation, air quality, soil quality and reduce flood costs. Research by the University of York showed mowing curbed water run-off and could drop the flood level in York by 40 centimetres. Further investment is needed for upper catchment management. Asked if the Minister would give way to discuss the point about meeting, but no further details were provided.
Richard Holden
Con
Basildon and Billericay
Heather burning is an effective part of countryside management, important for rural communities in North West Durham, including hospitality industry and part-time employment. The real issue is the managed return of blanket bog to areas that have been drained with grips removed. Managed burning can help biodiversity by allowing key species to return.
Robbie Moore
Con
Keighley and Ilkley
I draw attention to my experience with moorland restoration schemes. Controlled burning is a tool that achieves ecological benefits by removing older heather growth, promoting plant regeneration and providing diverse food sources for animals such as deer and mountain hares. It also acts as firebreaks against wildfires.
Robert Goodwill
Con
Scarborough and Whitby
Emphasised the importance of managing moorland to preserve peat, support wildlife, and prevent wildfires. Highlighted that controlled burning does not harm peat but promotes regeneration of heather and moss. Stated that land managers would face difficulties on very wet land if it becomes more boggy, emphasizing the need to burn moorlands to manage water storage effectively.
Barnsley South
Called on the Government to restate and act on their commitment to legislation promised over a year ago, emphasizing the need for immediate action to restore degraded peatlands and end burning practices. Mentioned that peatland restoration can prevent flooding downstream by absorbing water during heavy rainfall.
Government Response
Rebecca Pow
Government Response
Thank you for calling me, Mr Pritchard; it is an absolute pleasure to serve under your chairmanship. I am not sure whether I should say this, but what a fiery, hot topic this is. There are obviously diverse views on all sides, and the debate has been extremely well attended. We have heard some excellent and informed speeches, and I particularly thank the hon. Member for Sheffield, Hallam (Olivia Blake) for securing the debate, for her interest in this subject, and for the passion with which she speaks about subjects such as climate change. I take issue with the comments about biodiversity and the degradation caused under this Government. If the hon. Lady were following proceedings in the Environment Bill—members of that Committee are here —she would realise how committed the present Government are to the environment. It is right at the top of our agenda. Not only do we have measures in the Bill bringing forward biodiversity net gain, conservation covenants and local nature recovery strategies, but we have the £80 million green recovery fund, which the Prime Minister has topped up this week. That provides the green army that the hon. Lady was asking for, and all the jobs that go with it, to deliver the green recovery. We are all right behind that and the 10-point green plan, announced this week. Moorlands are made up of a mosaic of habitat types. One of the habitats of greatest interest is blanket bog, because of its peat-forming habitats. It generates layers of peat that can grow up and be metres thick, and it covers much of our uplands. Such bogs are an iconic and important part of our landscapes, as many hon. Members explained. They are one of our largest terrestrial carbon stores, a haven for rare and common wildlife, and have natural water-holding and water-cleaning properties. Restoring and better managing our peatlands is absolutely essential for the nature recovery, which I have just referred to, and tackling climate change. The Committee on Climate Change has highlighted the particular need to restore blanket bogs, as the hon. Member for Sheffield, Hallam said. That is why we are committed to publishing an English peat strategy that sets out our direction for restoration, protection and sustainable management. We will be providing millions of pounds to kick-start that restoration from another fund of money helping towards biodiversity, the £640 million nature for climate fund. Among other things in that strategy, we commit to putting our peatland into good hydrological order and condition by restoring it, with a commitment to 35,000 hectares' being restored by 2025, which is not very far away. Blanket bogs make up around a third of England's peatland area. They have formed over thousands of years and have created a massive store of carbon. Currently, only 18% of our protected blanket bog habitat is in good condition. That is a legacy of many things. Members might take issue with me, but it is because of a combination of draining, overgrazing, burning and gradual degradation. While upland degraded peats are responsible for only around 5% of greenhouse gas emissions from England's peatlands, it is important that we restore and sustainably manage these areas for the other multiple benefits that they provide, as well as the carbon issue. The impact of rotational burning of vegetation on blanket bog continues to be hotly debated by academics, scientists, land managers and everybody involved on all sides. This summer I received a dossier of the most recent scientific studies from the Uplands Partnership, which includes the Moorland Association and the Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, an organisation I know a lot about. In my past as an environmental reporter, I often met those organisations and reported on things that they did. I have looked closely at the issue and have met with our chief scientific adviser. I have taken advice from the Science Advisory Council. I have been at pains to analyse all the copious data, much of it conflicting. At the moment, the scientific data from the experts, from DEFRA and from Natural England is that, on balance and in general, in the UK the burning of vegetation on blanket bog moves the bog away from its original wet state, and risks vulnerable peat bog habitat's becoming drier and turning into a heathland habitat. Since 2015, Natural England has been working with landowners and managers, as he knows, to help phase out rotational burning where possible. That has included a range of methods. Some estates have signed voluntary commitments to suspend burning—the hon. Member for Sheffield, Hallam was slightly dismissive, saying that that had not worked, but actually there have been some real successes with that approach. Some estates have agreed to phase out their long-term plans at estate level, and some have consented to try cutting where it is possible. Natural England has successfully removed 47%—189 out of 402—of the consents to burn on protected land and, where estates hold long-term consents to burn, many have suspended the practice to enter into new, extended agri-environment schemes. However, that course of action is clearly not protecting every blanket bog site. I am going to plough on. I am very aware that moorland management communities are concerned about the restriction of burning—it has been referred to by my hon. Friend the Member for North West Durham (Mr Holden)—not least because of the wildfire risk on the land. Fires sweep through, cause severe damage and release fine particulate matter—I am also the Minister for air quality, so I am well aware of the dangers of fine particulate matter and the impacts on local air quality—and, obviously, we want to mitigate that. Natural England and DEFRA officials are considering all the evidence around all the different practices in relation to wildfire risk, to try to come up with the most appropriate technique to mitigate that risk. Some of the clearest evidence to date points to improving the resilience of the peatlands to return them to their wet state. We must also remember that those who farm and manage our uplands have massive opportunities coming their way, through the new environmental land management scheme, to engage in many other projects and undertake work that will keep the wildlife there, will help to keep the moorland wet and will help to drain, control and hold the water to deal with flooding. That was eloquently mentioned by the hon. Members for York Central (Rachael Maskell) and for Halifax (Holly Lynch), and I am happy to meet the hon. Member for York Central at some point to discuss her particular issues around peat and the uplands—apologies if I have not done that yet. We are watching Scotland eagerly to see what will happen up there and how things go; we will be taking stock of that. No, I will plough on. My officials are continuing to work out how and where we might be able to phase out rotational burning, but all these other options must be taken into account. Next, I wanted to touch on this issue of flooding; winter is coming and we have had a very wet year. Blanket bogs are a natural sponge; they sit at the top of river catchments and are important for holding water, but that is only possible when they are kept in good condition—that is one of the key things. We have done a great project working on Exmoor—not far from me—where the water company is doing exactly that, and it is having really good results. This is an important part of flood control, to which we have contributed £5.2 billion—more money than ever before. Nature-based solutions are a big part of the new systems coming down the track.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.