← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Protections for Emergency Service Workers
04 November 2020
Lead MP
Matt Vickers
Stockton West
Con
Responding Minister
Kit Malthouse
Tags
NHSEmploymentMental Health
Word Count: 10245
Other Contributors: 13
At a Glance
Matt Vickers raised concerns about protections for emergency service workers in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The MP asks for stronger laws and tougher sentences for those who assault emergency service workers, highlighting that the Government's sentencing White Paper proposes increasing the maximum penalty for assaulting an emergency worker from 12 months to two years. He also calls for a standardised body-worn camera system across all forces.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The MP is concerned about the increase in assaults on emergency service workers, highlighting that over 11,000 people were prosecuted for assaulting such workers in 2019 and this number has risen by a third this year. He mentions that between August 2019 and July 2020, 6,668 police officers were assaulted, which is an average of 18 assaults per day. In Cleveland alone, the assaults have increased from 440 to 662 in just one year.
Andrea Jenkyns
Welsh Liberal Democrats
Emergency service workers face daily pressures and abuse, with 2,185 assaults on West Yorkshire police recorded in Leeds and the wider region last year, up 15% from the previous year. The MP supports increasing the maximum penalty for assaulting an emergency worker to two years' imprisonment. Intervened to criticise the shadow Minister for political scoring during the debate, calling for unity across the House on such a critical issue.
Mr Carter congratulated the Member for Stockton South on securing the debate and acknowledged the difficult work done by police and emergency workers. He cited data showing an increase in assaults on police officers, particularly during the pandemic, and urged the Government to review sentencing laws to ensure they reflect the seriousness of such crimes.
Chris Clarkson
Con
Heywood and Middleton
Paid tribute to emergency services during the pandemic and advocated for legal reforms to ensure severe penalties for those who harm frontline workers, referencing the murder of police officers Nicola Hughes and Fiona Bone. Suggested a review or reform of laws on homicide to better protect emergency workers.
David Linden
SNP
Glasgow East
Paid tribute to emergency service workers in his constituency and highlighted the protections provided by the Emergency Workers (Scotland) Act 2005, which covers GPs, doctors, nurses, and midwives. He mentioned that penalties for abusing emergency service workers can include up to 12 months imprisonment or a £10,000 fine. The average custodial sentence increased from 151 days in 2009-10 to 169 days in 2018-19. Emphasised the support services available for NHS staff and Police Scotland's commitment to reducing violence against officers.
Emma Hardy
Lab
Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice
Acknowledged the bravery of emergency service workers in Hull and shared statistics on assaults: 999 officers assaulted over two years, 17 attacks against firefighters, and a prison officer assaulted every hour. Criticised cuts to services and staff numbers, called for increased investment not just in police officers but also in police staff, and emphasised the importance of mental health support.
Imran Ahmad Khan
Con
Bolton West
Expressed gratitude towards frontline emergency service workers and highlighted the physical and mental toll on these workers due to increased violence and trauma. Called for tougher sentences, including doubling maximum sentences from 12 months to two years, and noted the Home Office's investment of £6.7 million in taser purchases.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
The DUP Member highlights a 20% increase in emergency calls and responses by Northern Ireland Fire and Rescue Service, including hostile encounters with the public. He urges for a zero-tolerance policy backed by strong legal action against those who attack emergency service personnel.
Kieran Mullan
Con
Bexhill and Battle
Mr Mullan paid tribute to emergency service workers, especially his father who was a police officer for over 30 years. He highlighted the risk faced by these workers, noting that 1,600 police officers have died while serving in uniform. Mr Mullan also supported increasing the maximum penalty for assaulting emergency service workers and called for justice for victims like PC Andrew Harper.
Paul Girvan
DUP
North Down
Discussed the targeting of police officers in Northern Ireland, highlighting that courts are not always lenient on officers who take action to protect themselves and others. Emphasised the importance of body-worn cameras for evidence and called for stricter penalties against those who abuse emergency service workers.
Peter Gibson
Con
Darlington
Mr Gibson highlighted the rise in violence against emergency services personnel, mentioning that County Durham police has suffered 298 assaults since May. He emphasised the need for legal protections and cited a recommendation from the chief executive of the North East Ambulance Service for community sentences to be served within the service where the offence was committed.
Sarah Jones
Lab
Croydon West
She expressed concern over the rising number of assaults on police officers, which have increased by almost 50% in five years and more than 21% during lockdown. She highlighted financial costs associated with these attacks, such as £5 million from sick leave due to assaults in 2018-19. Jones also mentioned cuts to mental health services, leading police officers to frequently handle situations involving individuals suffering from a mental breakdown.
Sheryll Murray
Con
South East Cambridgeshire
Reminded Members that the case of PC Andrew Harper is sub judice and advised against making references to the merits or sentences in that case.
Tom Hunt
Lab
Ipswich
Mr Hunt thanked emergency services in Ipswich, especially Suffolk police, for their work during the pandemic. He praised the sensitivity of Suffolk constabulary and the Kestrel team in enforcing social distancing rules without overstepping boundaries. Mr Hunt also supported tougher sentencing for crimes against emergency service workers. He raised the issue of spitting at emergency service workers during the pandemic and asked for assurance that there are robust punishments in place for those who use covid as a weapon against police officers.
Government Response
Kit Malthouse
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mrs Murray, in what is a very well-timed debate given the increasing period of difficulty and complexity the whole country is going into. The minister acknowledges the challenges faced by frontline emergency workers and expresses gratitude for their work during lockdowns. He states that assaults on emergency workers are completely unacceptable and discusses specific sentences handed out to individuals who have assaulted or threatened emergency workers using coronavirus as a weapon, including two years in prison and six months' imprisonment. The Government intends to legislate to double the maximum penalty for assaults on emergency workers from 12 months to two years. He also mentions that the Home Secretary and Lord Chancellor met with Andrew Harper's widow, Lissie, to discuss Harper's law. £7.5 million has been invested in a new national police wellbeing service launched in April last year, providing guidance and resources for forces, officers, and staff, focusing on prevention and early identification of mental health issues. The Government is committed to introducing a police covenant with a focus on health and wellbeing, physical protection, and support for families, to be enshrined in law with annual reporting by the Home Secretary. Additionally, there are efforts to improve protections for other emergency service workers, such as those in the NHS and firefighters, through initiatives like the fire and rescue national framework.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.