← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Pet Theft
19 October 2020
Lead MP
Tom Hunt
Responding Minister
Victoria Prentis
Tags
Justice & CourtsAgriculture & Rural AffairsMental Health
Word Count: 13673
Other Contributors: 12
At a Glance
Tom Hunt raised concerns about pet theft in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The Government should elevate pet theft to a specific offence and empower judges to impose harsher sentences, potentially making it a category 2 crime with up to two years in prison. He also suggests that the Sentencing Council could amend guidelines to account for emotional distress in sentencing without changing laws.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Dr Daniel Allen's petitions on pet theft, supported by over 100,000 signatures each, highlight the issue of pets being treated as replaceable objects under current law. Only 1% of dog theft cases result in charges and just a few dozen dogs are stolen monthly across the UK, yet many more are at risk during lockdown due to increased loneliness. Tom Hunt cites examples where victims offer substantial rewards for the return of their pets, indicating the emotional value far exceeds monetary worth.
Caroline Nokes
Con
Romsey and Southampton North
Ms Caroline Nokes shared the story of Cleo, a four-year-old cocker spaniel stolen from an elderly constituent in Wherwell. She highlighted that despite being microchipped, spayed, and wearing a collar with contact information, Cleo was taken during a routine walk. The community has extensively searched for her using drones and thermal imaging cameras but to no avail. Ms Nokes emphasised the emotional distress caused by pet theft and called for decoupling sentencing from an animal's monetary value.
Craig Williams
Con
Montgomeryshire
Craig Williams acknowledges the strength of feeling about pet theft, noting that over 100,000 signatures were gathered for these petitions. He declares his interest as a springer spaniel owner and emphasises the personal value of pets goes beyond their monetary worth. He urges the Minister to amend the Theft Act 1968 or create a specific offence of pet theft to match the seriousness of such crimes.
Gareth Johnson
Con
Dartford
Pet theft is a particularly nasty offence, causing significant stress for both pet owners and the animals themselves. The current Sentencing Council guidelines are insufficient because they focus on the monetary value of stolen pets rather than their emotional and familial significance.
The speaker supported significant progress made by the Government on animal welfare but urged them to reconsider current laws on sentencing for pet theft due to its growing nature. She argued for a balanced risk-reward approach in deterring pet thieves and highlighted how linking penalties strictly to financial value undermines fairness for pet owners.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Jim Shannon highlighted the growing concern over pet theft and the need for enhanced security measures in pet stores and animal shelters. He called on the government to introduce stricter penalties for those convicted of such crimes. Mr. Shannon highlighted the issue of dog theft, particularly targeting gun dogs and shooting dogs. He argued for harsher penalties and better recording systems to deter thieves and aid in prosecutions. He also supported micro-chipping laws and proposed increasing sentences for animal cruelty offences. Jim Shannon raised the issue of puppy smuggling and dog trafficking between different regions, emphasizing the need for regional cooperation with the Republic of Ireland.
John Lamont
Con
Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk
The MP highlighted the high number of signatures for e-petition 244530 from his constituency, reflecting a deep love for pets among rural dwellers. He mentioned the emotional impact of pet theft on families and advocated for making pet theft a separate criminal offence to reflect its seriousness. The MP also raised concerns about flaws in the mandatory microchipping system that hinder tracing stolen pets.
Kieran Mullan
Con
Bexhill and Battle
Mr Mullan highlighted the issue of pet theft, noting that at least five dogs are stolen every day in England and Wales. He mentioned a study by Dr Allen from Keele University which found only 1% of pet thefts resulted in charges against the thief. Mr Mullan called for stronger measures to make it clear to criminals that stealing pets is a serious crime. He also pointed out that current sentencing guidelines may not adequately reflect the emotional impact of such crimes, and he suggested specific legislation or changes to existing guidelines might be necessary.
Lisa Cameron
SNP
East Dunbartonshire
As chair of the all-party parliamentary dog advisory welfare group, Lisa Cameron highlighted that pet theft has a significant emotional and psychological impact on victims. She emphasized that 99% of pet owners consider their pets to be family members and that losing a pet can have severe consequences for individuals, especially during lockdowns or isolation periods. Cameron also mentioned the difficulties in prosecuting pet thieves, with only one in five stolen dogs being found and returned to their owners.
Luke Pollard
Lab Co-op
Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Paid tribute to the hon. Member for Ipswich for introducing the debate, emphasised that pet theft is not just about economic loss but a kidnapping that affects families deeply. Called for comprehensive animal welfare legislation addressing microchipping, sentencing guidelines, and puppy smuggling. Highlighted cross-party support for such measures and encouraged the Minister to consider adopting the Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Bill as a Government Bill.
Matt Vickers
Con
Stockton West
Pet theft is a growing issue causing distress to pet owners across the country. The pandemic has increased the attachment people have with their pets, making it even more painful when they are stolen. Pet theft must be addressed by reflecting its non-monetary value and emotional impact in law.
Peter Gibson
Con
Darlington
If a pet is stolen, it cannot be replaced like other possessions such as phones or cars. Peter Gibson highlights that the theft of pets affects many constituents in Darlington and discusses how only one in five pets are ever returned to their owners despite over 2,000 dogs being stolen annually. He supports mandatory microchipping for dogs and cats and suggests specific sentencing guidance based on more than just the purchase cost of an animal.
Ms. Murray focused on the Conservative party's manifesto pledge regarding compulsory microchipping of cats, emphasizing its importance in reducing cat theft and ensuring pets are reunited with their owners. She requested an update from the Minister on the progress towards implementing this policy.
Government Response
Victoria Prentis
Government Response
The Minister acknowledged the importance of pets to their owners and highlighted several measures taken by the Government, including new animal welfare regulations, a call for evidence on cat microchipping, and ongoing discussions regarding tougher sentencing guidelines. She also mentioned that while creating a specific offence for pet theft with a two-year custodial penalty might not be necessary, continuing discussions on sentencing guidelines was essential.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.