← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Football Attendances: VAR — [Mr Clive Betts in the Chair]

17 March 2020

Lead MP

Toby Perkins
Chesterfield
Lab

Responding Minister

Nigel Huddleston

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 6594
Other Contributors: 6

At a Glance

Toby Perkins raised concerns about football attendances: var — [mr clive betts in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The MP calls for the abolition of VAR, arguing it should not be tolerated unless significant changes are made to its operation, including reviewing the offside law and involving fans in decision-making processes. He also requests that decisions only be altered if they are clear and obvious errors.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Chesterfield
Opened the debate
The MP is concerned that the implementation of Video Assistant Referee (VAR) in football has negatively impacted the sport's appeal and fans' enjoyment. He cites issues such as delays in decision-making, offside decisions based on hairline margins, and the lack of spontaneity during matches. The YouGov poll showed 67% of fans felt VAR had made watching football less enjoyable.

Government Response

Nigel Huddleston
Government Response
He noted the professional tone of the debate despite challenging circumstances. He recognised the importance of football clubs to local communities and emphasised the premier league's global appeal, with matches broadcast in over 192 countries. Since introducing VAR in 2018, attendance has remained high at record levels above 95%. The minister highlighted ongoing efforts by the EFL Away Fan Experience Project and iFollow service to enhance fan engagement. He acknowledged that while VAR may cause delays, it does not seem to affect fans' interest in attending matches or watching games. The Government committed £550 million towards grassroots football facilities in support of England's bid for the 2030 World Cup, building on the Football Foundation's work since 2000. He concluded by praising the premier league and EFL for their efforts to improve fans' matchday experience and their investment in community programs.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.