← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Post Office and Horizon Software
05 March 2020
Lead MP
Lucy Allan
Telford
Con
Responding Minister
Paul Scully
Tags
Justice & CourtsBusiness & TradeMental Health
Word Count: 12810
Other Contributors: 18
At a Glance
Lucy Allan raised concerns about post office and horizon software in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The MP urged the Minister to work with the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) to ensure that wrongful convictions are quashed and criminal records expunged. She requested a mechanism for compensation and support for those affected by this injustice, emphasizing the need for justice to be served without further delays.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The MP highlighted the need for a mechanism to address the miscarriage of justice faced by postmasters affected by flaws in the Post Office's Horizon IT system. She noted that these individuals were wrongly accused and imprisoned, causing significant stigma and social isolation within their communities. The MP also criticized the Post Office's war-like attrition tactics during the litigation process, including repeated appeals against judgments to wear down claimants.
Andrew Bridgen
Con
unknown constituency
Sub-postmasters were often forced into admitting guilt due to false accounting issues because of the contract constraints and lack of immediate Post Office support, leading them to believe they could resolve discrepancies the next day. Andrew Bridgen highlighted the case of Michael Rudkin, a sub-postmaster who discovered remote access to Horizon systems in 2008. He detailed how Mr Rudkin was misled by Post Office Ltd about the existence of such access and subsequently faced financial ruin due to false allegations. Mr Bridgen intervened briefly to mention that during their investigations, they discovered a suspense account in the Horizon system which had unallocated funds running into hundreds of thousands of pounds annually for three years. Andrew Bridgen asked Emma Lewell-Buck about sub-postmasters who were coerced into pleading guilty and inquired what compensation they should receive for such coercion. Asks if the Minister can give way, but no further content is provided.
Duncan Baker
Con
North Norfolk
Mr. Duncan Baker, a former sub-postmaster, expressed empathy for the hundreds of innocent victims accused of theft due to the flawed Horizon system. He highlighted cases where individuals were bankrupted and jailed despite their innocence. One constituent was offered a plea deal to avoid jail time but with significant financial penalties, amounting to £21,000. Baker criticised the lack of financial compensation for these victims and called for full reimbursement from the Post Office board accountable for this issue.
Emma Lewell-Buck
Lab
South Shields
Emma Lewell-Buck highlighted the long-standing issues with the Post Office's Horizon computer system, which has caused significant harm to sub-postmasters. She detailed cases where individuals were accused of fraud and theft due to discrepancies in the system, leading to financial losses, reputational damage, and personal distress. The Member emphasized that these incidents amount to more than mere mistakes by the Post Office but a severe miscarriage of justice affecting hundreds of lives.
Gerald Jones
Lab
Merthyr Tydfil and Aberdare
Gerald Jones welcomed the BEIS Committee inquiry but stressed that no amount of compensation can restore dignity lost due to this scandal's long-term impact on physical and mental health.
Gill Furniss
Lab
Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
Ms Gill Furniss highlighted the serious issues surrounding the management of Post Office Ltd, emphasising the wrongful convictions and severe impacts on sub-postmasters. She cited specific cases where individuals faced unemployment, financial ruin, community ostracisation, and even suicide. She criticised the £58 million settlement for not addressing the broader justice needed and called for a group expungement of criminal records rather than individual legal actions. She urged the Minister to work with the Ministry of Justice for fair overturning of convictions. Critiques the Minister for not understanding the need for an independent judge-led inquiry to address the issues faced by those affected by Horizon software.
Ian Cawsey
Lab
Dudley South
The MP emphasised that legal costs from the settlement will significantly reduce available compensation, leaving many former postmasters unable to recover actual losses suffered due to flawed Horizon IT system.
Ian Paisley Jnr
DUP
North Antrim
Mr Paisley highlighted the impact of the Post Office scandal on postmasters and their families. He called for expedited justice through a fast-track process, citing his experience with similar cases involving wrongful convictions. He criticized the current compensation package as insufficient and urged transparency regarding payments made to legal representatives.
Jason McCartney
Con
Colne Valley
Jason McCartney expressed support for his colleague's work on the issue and asked her to continue working with him and other MPs to secure justice and full redress for victims of this miscarriage of justice.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Jim Shannon agreed that since courts have found the Horizon system unreliable, convictions based on it may also be unreliable, suggesting a need to review them despite the judgment not addressing this directly.
John Howell
Con
Henley
John Howell criticised the mediation process, arguing that more than £57 million was paid out with most of it going to lawyers, which undermines the integrity of the settlement.
Karl Turner
Lab
Kingston upon Hull East
Karl Turner argued that as the Government effectively wholly owned the Post Office, they should cover legal fees incurred by victims seeking justice and compensation. Described a case of Janet Skinner, a sub-postmaster prosecuted for false accounting and given a nine-month prison sentence. Criticised the Post Office's conduct in leading sub-postmasters to commit false accounting without proper investigation or support. Highlighted issues with legal representation and contract terms which forbade independent counsel during initial proceedings. Suggested this case as an example of predatory capitalism, noting lack of funding for victims' civil litigation. Karl Turner called for government intervention, stating that the Post Office should be forced to compensate affected sub-postmasters after years of misleading them and abusing prosecution powers. Inquires whether the Government and Post Office Ltd support an independent judge-led inquiry after speaking with the new chief executive.
Maria Eagle
Lab
Liverpool Garston
Maria Eagle commended the debate and discussed her constituent Karl Reid's experience of losing £50,000 and two businesses without facing jail time or a conviction, emphasizing broader consequences beyond convictions. My hon. Friend agrees that wrongful convictions involving guilty pleas pose a significant challenge, as the legal system lacks mechanisms to overturn such convictions when there are valid reasons for reconsideration. Requests that the Government ensure those who pleaded guilty will have an opportunity to have their convictions overturned.
Marion Fellows
SNP
East Antrim
Called for a full independent inquiry into the Horizon system, criticising successive Tory Governments for their hands-off approach to Post Office Ltd. Highlighted that Post Office Ltd has caused untold damage and financial harm to innocent people, and emphasised the need for compensation and support for victims.
Martin Vickers
Con
Brigg and Immingham
Asks if the Minister can give way, but no further content is provided.
Patricia Gibson
SNP
North Ayrshire and Arran
Patricia Gibson called for a full public inquiry into the Post Office scandal beyond just a Select Committee hearing to prevent such issues from recurring, emphasizing its far-reaching consequences on individuals.
Philip Dunne
Con
West Dorset
Philip Dunne highlighted his constituent Rubbina Shaheen's case, urging for action to hold responsible parties accountable and provide justice to constituents affected by the scandal. The hon. Gentleman raises a powerful point regarding legal complexities, but I also question why corporate governance did not address widespread allegations across the country instead of resorting to legal action immediately.
Sharon Hodgson
Lab
Washington and Gateshead South
Sharon Hodgson called for the Government to ensure victims receive rightful compensation beyond just overturning wrongful convictions, highlighting her constituent's losses exceeding £100,000. Agreed with Marion Fellows's call for a full independent inquiry and stressed the importance of following the money to understand where the funds went and how they should be used for compensation.
Tonia Antoniazzi
Lab
Gower
Tonia Antoniazzi questioned what hope victims can have regarding the timescale for redress, noting that compensation does not cover losses fully and is mostly spent on legal fees. The MP stressed the need for full compensation and support for sub-postmasters who paid money they did not owe, as a result of till discrepancies caused by flaws in the Horizon system.
Government Response
Paul Scully
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr McCabe. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Telford (Lucy Allan) on securing this important debate about the Criminal Cases Review Commission's review of the convictions. The Minister acknowledges that there has been significant human cost and complexity in cases involving postmasters affected by issues with Horizon software. He commits to ensuring a thorough investigation, recognizing the need for proper forensic accounting and individual case analysis by the Court of Appeal, despite the CCRC's limitation on reviewing groups of cases. The Post Office's new CEO, Nick Read, is seen as understanding the relationship between sub-postmasters and the network due to his background in independent retail associations. The Minister assures that the Government will challenge the Post Office proactively to ensure lessons are learned from past mistakes, and he highlights the importance of maintaining confidence in the criminal justice system through CCRC processes.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.