← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

UK Fisheries

12 February 2020

Lead MP

Sheryll Murray
South East Cornwall
Con

Responding Minister

George Eustice

Tags

EconomyTaxationBrexitAgriculture & Rural Affairs
Word Count: 13677
Other Contributors: 14

At a Glance

Sheryll Murray raised concerns about uk fisheries in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Ms Murray calls for the Minister to meet with fishermen's representatives and fish auctioneers to address concerns about the new MMO licensing app. She also requests that the Government restores terms from the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 to prevent non-UK vessels from benefiting from UK fishing quotas, ensuring all catch is landed in UK ports. The Fisheries Bill should mandate that fish caught under UK quota be landed in UK ports to support job creation, and there should be a redistribution of quotas from large multinational companies to smaller boats to boost employment. The Government must also address safety issues and provide holistic support for the fishing industry.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

South East Cornwall
Opened the debate
Ms Murray is concerned about the impact of past fishing policies on small boatyards and fishermen in her constituency. She highlights that under the common fisheries policy, smaller vessels received inadequate quota allocations, leading to significant hardship for those involved in the industry. She also mentions safety issues arising from new licensing conditions imposed by the Marine Management Organisation (MMO), which require skippers of under-10-metre boats to estimate fish catches within a 10% tolerance, risking criminal prosecution with severe penalties. Fleetwood's deep sea fishing industry suffered significant decline in the late 1960s and early 1970s, leading to a loss of jobs and identity for the town. The community is concerned about the impact of trade negotiations with the EU on UK waters and fears a sense of betrayal if control over fishing rights is ceded.

Government Response

George Eustice
Government Response
I begin by congratulating my hon. Friend the Member for South East Cornwall (Mrs Murray), who has been a passionate campaigner for the fishing industry, noting her technical knowledge of this sector is second to none. The minister explained the genesis of the problem with the common fisheries policy, highlighting that in the 1970s, as the UK joined the European Union, it gave EU control over access to its waters and was simultaneously being driven out of traditional fishing grounds in Iceland. This led to an unfair share of the catch under relative stability, a mechanism set in stone since the late 1970s based on a non-representative reference period. The minister emphasized that the UK's right to control its exclusive economic zone is based on international law and not subject to negotiation with the EU. The minister stated that the approach will move away from relative stability towards a more scientific approach based on zonal attachment, similar to Norway's model. He highlighted progress made in preparing for this new world, mentioning the Fisheries Bill passing through its Second Reading. The bill aims to commit the UK to sustainable fishing and have management plans for individual stocks, control access to its exclusive economic zone, and change technical conservation measures. The minister addressed concerns about a new app required for vessels under 10 metres, noting it is crucial for improving data quality but designed at industry request to be simpler. He also mentioned the potential review of provisions in the Merchant Shipping Act regarding foreign-owned vessels landing more catch into UK ports but noted no immediate plans for such legislation. Several MPs raised issues about attracting new entrants and the importance of resolving questions around the Northern Ireland protocol. The minister acknowledged these points, noting the government is examining approaches adopted elsewhere to support new entrants and is clear that Northern Ireland will remain part of the UK customs union while some minor technical details need further work.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.