← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Waste Incineration Facilities

11 February 2020

Lead MP

Sharon Hodgson
Washington and Gateshead South
Lab

Responding Minister

Rebecca Pow

Tags

ClimateStandards & EthicsLocal Government
Word Count: 13274
Other Contributors: 13

At a Glance

Sharon Hodgson raised concerns about waste incineration facilities in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The MP asks for more recycling as a solution instead of incineration. She also questions how the Government expects to meet its carbon-neutral target by 2050 while approving such applications. She suggests introducing a tax on incineration to encourage higher recycling rates, similar to the landfill tax. I ask the Government and Enfield Council to pause, review and consult on the decision regarding the new incinerator in Edmonton until rigorous independent evidence can inform a proper decision. I also invite the Minister to come to Edmonton and chair a roundtable discussion with my constituents, Enfield Council and local environmental groups. Jones requests that the Environment Agency be granted broader powers to address minor and frequent breaches swiftly and effectively. He also calls for a review of the planning system to consider cumulative impact and proximity issues when granting permits and planning permissions.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Washington and Gateshead South
Opened the debate
The MP opposes a planning application for a waste incineration gasification facility in her constituency, Hillthorn Park. She cites opposition from over 10,800 constituents who signed a petition. Concerns include public health risks due to lack of transparency on technology and safety standards, carbon emissions contributing to climate change, noise and pollution from HGV traffic, impact on local roads, and potential devaluation of property values if the plant is built. I am concerned about the construction of a new energy recovery facility in Edmonton, which is one of London's three major waste incineration facilities. There are over 45 years old, and the current facility will be replaced with a new energy recovery facility that is expected to produce more than 700,000 tonnes of CO2 every year. The evidence suggests that this new incinerator will emit dangerous pollutants far beyond EU toxic emissions limits, leading to public health consequences such as asthma attacks and respiratory disease. Additionally, the construction site is in close proximity to schools, which raises concerns about the long-term impacts on children's developing lungs. Darren Jones is concerned about the significant increase in waste passing through local facilities in Avonmouth, his constituency. This has led to an annual spike in fly populations during hot weather periods due to stored waste bundles on open land. He highlights that Bristol City Council's planning policies aimed at favouring the circular economy were overridden by national authorities, concentrating waste processing plants without local consent. The issue persists despite efforts by local officials, indicating a need for more robust action.

Government Response

Rebecca Pow
Government Response
The Government's commitment to reducing, reusing and recycling waste is reflected in the Environment Bill. The bill aims for a 65% municipal waste recycling rate by 2035 and a minimum of 70% packaging waste recycling rate by 2030. Energy from waste plants are regulated by the Environment Agency with strict emission limits to ensure minimal impact on air quality. The Government will invest £800 million in carbon capture technology to further reduce emissions. Local authorities remain responsible for their own areas and must follow development plans, with the Planning Inspectorate assessing all relevant material planning considerations for appeals.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.