← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange
11 February 2020
Lead MP
Alberto Costa
South Leicestershire
Con
Responding Minister
Luke Hall
Tags
EmploymentClimateLocal Government
Word Count: 4273
Other Contributors: 1
At a Glance
Alberto Costa raised concerns about hinckley national rail freight interchange in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
I ask the Minister to commit to ensuring that the concerns of South Leicestershire residents are properly considered before any decision is made regarding the Hinkley rail hub proposal. I also request an investigation into legislation governing such proposals to ensure rural areas are not overburdened.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
I am concerned about the impact of the proposed Hinkley national rail freight interchange on South Leicestershire, particularly the Fosse villages and their infrastructure. The area is already struggling with overburdened roads and logistics parks. The proposal involves concreting over a 440-acre site that includes Burbage common, a local nature reserve and site of special scientific interest. My constituents are worried about environmental degradation, increased traffic, and the strain on local biodiversity.
Luke Evans
Con
Hinckley and Bosworth
Questions the environmental benefits of taking freight off roads to rail, expresses concern over potential road congestion on the A5, highlights concerns about the use of Burbage common for recreational activities, asks if there are plans to address the impact on local amenities like doctors' surgeries and schools due to new jobs created by the hub. Inquires about the capability of roads in his constituency to handle more HGVs and requests data from the lead MP. Will my hon. Friend the Minister give way?
Government Response
Luke Hall
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Gary. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for South Leicestershire (Alberto Costa) for securing a debate that is clearly important to many people in his constituency and beyond its borders. We have had an informative discussion.
Before describing our policy on the development of strategic rail freight interchanges, I am glad to be able to provide some context for this debate. As a Government, we absolutely recognise the important benefits that rail freight offers to the United Kingdom, including substantial benefits for the environment, as one of the most carbon-efficient ways to move goods over long distances. The sector also delivers economic and social benefits through cost savings to industry, and by supporting employment and reducing congestion, with rail freight resulting in 7.2 million fewer lorry journeys each year. Industry estimates that rail freight provides £1.7 billion of benefits to the United Kingdom economy.
Between 2014 and 2019, Government invested £235 million in improving capacity and capability for rail freight. Recently, we also increased by 28%, to £20 million, the budget for a freight grant scheme to support the carriage of freight by rail and water on routes where road haulage has an advantage.
To be helpful, I will also set out the purpose of strategic rail freight interchanges. Such interchanges are large multi-purpose rail freight interchange and distribution centres linked to both the rail and the trunk road systems. They enable freight to be transferred efficiently between transport modes. Many rail freight movements are unable to undertake a full end-to-end journey for relevant goods.
I understand that the Hinckley SRFI proposals are at the pre-application stage. From this debate and others, I know that he is a passionate advocate for his community. He is absolutely right to bring this debate to the Chamber, and he has made his thoughts and concerns heard at a ministerial level. Importantly, this debate has been a good opportunity for us to understand the depth of feeling in my hon. Friend's constituency.
I hope my hon. Friend will appreciate that as the proposed strategic rail freight interchange in question is currently in the planning process, I am not able to comment, as the Minister responsible for local government, on the specific merits of the proposals at this stage. That is because the Government may be asked to opine on the development at a later stage.
The nationally significant infrastructure projects regime also allows Government, through national policy statements, to set the policies for how schemes are to be considered. The national networks national policy statement provides a clear framework for strategic rail freight interchange developers, local authorities and the Planning Inspectorate.
In deciding whether the application can progress to examination, the inspectorate will consider whether the developer has fulfilled its statutory duty to consult local communities and local authorities affected by the scheme. Indeed, community engagement is fundamental to the nationally significant infrastructure projects regime's operation. Developers are required to consult extensively before an application is submitted and considered; and where the consultation has not been carried out in line with the statutory requirements, the Planning Inspectorate can refuse to accept the application.
I assure my hon. Friend that in considering any proposed development, the Planning Inspectorate and the Secretary of State weigh its adverse impacts against the benefits. That includes the facilitation of economic development, including job creation, housing and environmental improvement, any long-term or wider benefit and any longer-term and cumulative adverse impacts, as well as any measure to avoid, reduce or compensate for those impacts.
The rail freight sector is vital to the prosperity of the United Kingdom economy, delivers important social benefits and is key to meeting net zero targets. An expanded network of strategic rail freight interchanges is key to harnessing the benefits of rail freight, and the Government support the development of that network.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.