← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

British Overseas Passport Holders in Hong Kong

29 January 2020

Lead MP

Stephen Hammond
Wimbledon
Con

Responding Minister

Heather Wheeler

Tags

Foreign Affairs
Word Count: 2675
Other Contributors: 1

At a Glance

Stephen Hammond raised concerns about british overseas passport holders in hong kong in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I ask the Government to consider extending residency rights for BNO passport holders or exploring alternative immigration categories that could offer protection and reassurance. Specifically, I seek clarity on consular access policies for individuals holding BNO passports and any potential adjustments to address current vulnerabilities.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Wimbledon
Opened the debate
I am concerned about the situation in Hong Kong following recent protests and the impact on British National (Overseas) passport holders. There are over 300,000 full British citizens in Hong Kong, with around 250,000 having BNO passports. These individuals face potential vulnerability due to their status and there is a fear they may become more susceptible to arrest by authorities. Furthermore, comparisons are drawn with the rights of citizens from other former colonies, raising concerns about fairness.

Government Response

Heather Wheeler
Government Response
Explained that BNO status was established as part of the delicate balance in negotiations leading to the Sino-British Joint Declaration and cannot be altered. Stated that the UK Government will continue to monitor the implementation of the declaration closely and support the rights and freedoms of BNO holders, while urging for a credible independent inquiry into recent events and meaningful political dialogue within Hong Kong.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.