← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Free Period Product Scheme for Schools

15 December 2021

Lead MP

Ruth Cadbury
Brentford and Isleworth
Lab

Responding Minister

Will Quince

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 4627
Other Contributors: 1

At a Glance

Ruth Cadbury raised concerns about free period product scheme for schools in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The MP asks the government to consider making the scheme an opt-out rather than opt-in, improving communication with schools about the scheme, expanding product offerings to include multi-use items like reusable pads and mooncups, ensuring a more permanent footing for the scheme, addressing regional inequalities through pupil premium numbers, and looking at Scotland's Act as a model.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Brentford and Isleworth
Opened the debate
The scheme's sign-up rate is concerning with only 41% of primary schools participating. There are regional variations in uptake, such as the north-east having a lower sign-up rate compared to London at 44% versus 50%. The stigma around periods persists and period poverty has worsened due to increased living costs. One in fourteen girls have missed school because they could not afford or access period products.

Government Response

Will Quince
Government Response
Extends free period product scheme until August 2022; commits to meeting the hon. Member for Brentford and Isleworth at a later date to discuss further details; emphasizes removing stigma around periods through education curriculum. Announces plans to explore including additional products like period pants in the scheme, with a focus on sustainability. Reports that take-up rates are high among secondary schools (76%) and colleges (79%).
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.