← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Neighbourhood Policing: West Midlands

14 December 2021

Lead MP

Preet Kaur Gill
Birmingham Edgbaston
Lab Co-op

Responding Minister

Kit Malthouse

Tags

Policing & ResourcesCrime & Law EnforcementNHSBenefits & WelfareMental Health
Word Count: 8382
Other Contributors: 7

At a Glance

Preet Kaur Gill raised concerns about neighbourhood policing: west midlands in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Will the Minister give West Midlands police the fair funding they need, ensuring that victims of crime receive timely advice, care, and support? Will he hear the pleas of constituents who feel let down by the Government?

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Birmingham Edgbaston
Opened the debate
The west midlands has the fourth highest rate of crime in the country, with a significant drop in charge rates and conviction rates for victims of violent offences. The region has lost over 2,000 officers since 2010 and had £175 million slashed from its budgets. In addition to cuts to youth clubs and mental health services, police are increasingly dealing with complex crimes like human trafficking and child sexual abuse.

Government Response

Kit Malthouse
Government Response
The Minister dismissed Labour Members' criticisms as a 'naked political manoeuvre', emphasizing that difficult financial decisions were necessary. He highlighted the impact of previous decisions by police and crime commissioners on the current performance of different forces, particularly in the West Midlands. The Minister acknowledged the significant funding increase for the West Midlands Police force (£655.5 million next year) and urged investment in neighbourhood policing. He noted that a new funding formula is being developed to replace the outdated one.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.