← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Community Energy Schemes — [Mr Clive Betts in the Chair]

30 November 2021

Lead MP

Wera Hobhouse
Bath
Lib Dem

Responding Minister

Greg Hands

Tags

Energy
Word Count: 13535
Other Contributors: 16

At a Glance

Wera Hobhouse raised concerns about community energy schemes — [mr clive betts in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The member asks the Minister to commit to including the Local Electricity Bill in future energy legislation and to outline any potential distortions or unintended consequences of changing the rules. She also requests a meeting with government officials to work constructively on improving the bill.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Bath
Opened the debate
The member is concerned about the lack of progress in community energy schemes, noting that only 278 MW of electricity generation capacity has been achieved since 2016. She highlights that no existing community energy group in the UK can sell its electricity directly to local customers due to outdated licensing rules. The speaker also points out that Licence Lite, established in 2009, has only resulted in three geographically-based energy supply licences being granted.

Government Response

Greg Hands
Government Response
Let me begin by congratulating the hon. Member for Bath (Wera Hobhouse) on securing this important debate, and for pre-submitting the three questions that I will answer during the course of my speech...I am committed to examining the obstacles and speaking to my hon. Friend; I know his long-standing interest in this, as indeed in all energy questions—he is the Mr Energy of East Anglia. I am very happy to continue to engage with hon. Members, to look at the obstacles and to see what can be overcome, ameliorated or worked around.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.