← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Islamophobia Awareness Month — [Peter Dowd in the Chair]

24 November 2021

Lead MP

Afzal Khan
Manchester Rusholme
Lab

Responding Minister

Kemi Badenoch

Tags

Crime & Law EnforcementCommunity SecurityWomen & Equalities
Word Count: 14637
Other Contributors: 27

At a Glance

Afzal Khan raised concerns about islamophobia awareness month — [peter dowd in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Khan asks the Government to outline measures introduced by them to keep users safe online and steps taken to tackle far-right activity. He also seeks answers on why someone with Islamophobic views was appointed to head the review of the Prevent strategy, the refusal to engage with the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), and whether the term 'Islamophobia' will be used during the debate.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Manchester Rusholme
Opened the debate
Afzal Khan is concerned about the rampant Islamophobia in society that manifests as hate crime, discrimination and loss of opportunity for Muslims. He cites specific examples such as a 40% increase in online Islamophobia during the pandemic, according to Tell MAMA, and recent attacks on mosques. Additionally, he mentions the conflation of Islam with terrorism and highlights Home Office data showing an exponential increase in referrals to Prevent for extreme right-wing ideology.

Government Response

Kemi Badenoch
Government Response
The highly partisan nature in which the debate has been opened will look not like people trying to tackle anti-Muslim hatred but as if they are being used as a political football for political goals.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.