← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
The Coroner Service
28 October 2021
Lead MP
Bob Neill
Bromley and Chislehurst
Con
Responding Minister
James Cartlidge
Tags
Justice & CourtsStandards & Ethics
Word Count: 13444
Other Contributors: 6
At a Glance
Bob Neill raised concerns about the coroner service in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
Mr. Neill asks the government to reconsider its stance on a national coroner service and to publish cost analyses that support their conclusions. He also requests information on plans for establishing an inspectorate, addressing access to legal aid for bereaved families, and improving recruitment of pathologists by reviewing fees.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Mr. Neill is concerned about the inconsistencies in the coroner service due to localised funding, which affects bereaved families differently across the country. He notes that previous reports have called for a national coroner service but the government has been unwilling to agree, citing cost as an issue despite compelling evidence suggesting otherwise. Mr. Neill highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in the system, mentioning unfulfilled promises regarding reviews of existing legislation and the publication of documents like the review from 2015.
Andrew Slaughter
Lab
Hammersmith and Chiswick
Mr Slaughter criticised the government's response to the Justice Committee's report on the coroner system, arguing it was inadequate. He highlighted issues such as non-means tested legal aid provision, appeals on coroners' decisions, pathologists' fees, a national coroner service, an inspectorate, and complaints procedure among others. Mr Slaughter also mentioned personal experiences of inquests where families lacked proper representation while state bodies were well-funded and represented.
Andy Slaughter
Lab
Hammersmith
The MP contributed substantial knowledge on the report's content and debated about issues like national service reforms and legal aid access for families, supporting the lead MP's concerns.
Caroline Flint
Lab
Delyn
I raise concerns about the impact of current policies on the Coroner Service in my constituency, highlighting delays and inadequate resources.
Chris Clarkson
Con
Wigan
Acknowledging the challenges faced by coroners, I emphasise the need for a review to address systemic issues and improve efficiency within the service.
Maria Eagle
Lab
Liverpool Garston
Agrees with the adversarial nature of some coroner's inquests and highlights that families simply want to know what happened to their loved ones. Also raises concern about a shortage of pathologists impacting the capacity of coroners courts. Ms. Eagle emphasized the importance of addressing family needs and highlighted issues such as inconsistencies in practice and accessibility to support services, adding detailed points about the Hillsborough case. Discussed issues with the coroner service, highlighting the Hillsborough disaster as an example of how inquests can fail bereaved families. Emphasised the need for equality of arms between public bodies and bereaved families during inquests.
Tim Loughton
Con
East Worthing and Shoreham
Tim Loughton raised concerns about the inefficiency of coroners' investigations, specifically mentioning the delay in conducting an inquest for the Shoreham air show crash victims. He also discussed his private Member's Bill regarding stillbirths, which is yet to see full implementation despite its importance and widespread support.
Government Response
James Cartlidge
Government Response
Responded to the Justice Committee's report on coroner services, expressing gratitude for the committee's thorough inquiry and stakeholders' evidence. Acknowledged challenges faced by coroners due to COVID-19 while praising their continued service delivery. Highlighted that the Government accepted six recommendations outright and are working on them. Mentioned measures in the Judicial Review and Courts Bill aimed at streamlining processes and supporting recovery plans. Addressed delays in the Shoreham air show inquest, legal aid for bereaved families, and considerations regarding a national coroner service.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.