Interim results from a Muslim Census survey reveal that nearly 10,000 Muslim students are either opting out of university or being forced to self-fund. The speaker suggests it is time for the Government to revisit David Cameron's 2013 commitment on alternative student finance options. The speaker highlighted the financial hardships faced by students due to the covid-19 crisis, criticising the government for ignoring student needs. She mentioned that tuition fees of £9,250 a year are too high and that such fees deter poorer students from applying to university because of debt fears. Begum also argued against reducing the salary threshold at which students repay their loans, stating it would be regressive.

It is worth mentioning for viewers that there are opportunities to visit Parliament and see debates in action, encouraging student organisations to meet MPs and influence policy. Carol Monaghan highlighted the disparity in student debt between Scotland and England, noting that Scottish graduates typically owe around £12,000 compared to £43,000-£50,000 for English graduates. She questioned whether education should be a personal benefit or serve societal needs, emphasizing the need for well-educated individuals post-Brexit due to skills shortages. Monaghan criticized high tuition fees in England and called on the Government to follow Scotland's lead by reducing or abolishing fees entirely. I like the word 'outcomes'; we will have parity of esteem when students from different backgrounds attend universities and colleges in proportion to their numbers. May I ask the Minister when we are likely to see the recommendations of the Augar review implemented, including significantly reducing the student fees that are being paid?

Western expressed concern about the challenges students have faced due to the pandemic, including reduced graduate employment prospects and high tuition fees. He cited a survey indicating that disadvantaged Muslim students find it difficult to finance higher education. He called for a shift in perspective on education from individualised to communal benefit and advocated for more progressive funding models similar to those in Germany. This is not a difficult question, but I want to pick up on the point made by the hon. Member for Glasgow North West (Carol Monaghan). When the response to the Augar review is made—I think it is now two years, or two and a half years; I have lost track—will the Minister commit today to making that in the Chamber to us and not through the media? On accommodation costs, the Minister will be aware that there are many campuses across the country where there is no accommodation owned by the university itself—it is all in private hands. Will she provide the data that show the rate of increase in cost and how that has tracked over the past five years, relative to inflation? My understanding is that it is exceeding inflation. The hon. Gentleman talks about an investment as a personal investment, which is the crux of the issue. It is not just the cost to the individual, because there is a cost to us as taxpayers. Should it be a socialised cost, which is a cost to all of society as an investment in our future generations who might pay our pensions, look after us or teach our children? Or should the cost be paid by the individual?

Ms Maskell highlighted the challenges faced by students and academic staff during the pandemic, including financial difficulties due to unfulfilled tuition obligations. She raised concerns about a 20% fall in pay for university staff over the last decade, cuts to pensions, and growing inequalities regarding gender and disabilities. The MP urged the Government to invest more in higher education as a means of economic development, advocating for measures such as a degree-plus programme and removing barriers that prevent mature students from pursuing further studies. She called for an examination of student financing with a view to improving access and financial support.

The MP expressed concern over the lack of student voice in debates about university fees, which have risen from £1,000 to £9,250 since 1998. He highlighted that one third of working-age graduates are not in high-skilled employment and nearly half of parents would prefer their child to take up a vocational qualification instead of going to university. He also mentioned that the average debt for full-time undergraduates is £45,900.