← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Ethnicity Pay Gap

20 September 2021

Lead MP

Elliot Colburn

Responding Minister

Paul Scully

Tags

EmploymentWomen & Equalities
Word Count: 9455
Other Contributors: 6

At a Glance

Elliot Colburn raised concerns about ethnicity pay gap in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I call upon the Government to introduce mandatory ethnicity pay gap reporting to enable organisations to understand their workforce better and identify barriers to equality. I also request that they publish their analysis of the 2018 consultation later this year.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
I am concerned about the lack of data available to gauge the ethnicity pay gap in workplaces. There is a need for employers to be held accountable when there are disparities, and introducing mandatory reporting could shine a light on race/ethnicity-based inequality in the workplace. The petition has garnered 130,567 signatures, highlighting public demand for such measures.

Government Response

Paul Scully
Government Response
The Government are committed to building back better from the pandemic, ensuring fair representation for people from minority ethnic backgrounds in the workplace. Employment rates for ethnic minorities continue to be lower than those for white people, despite improvements, and once employed, they progress less and earn less money. The Minister noted challenges in designing an accurate ethnicity pay reporting methodology due to statistical anomalies such as skewed data. He highlighted that 22% of civil service employees did not identify their ethnicity, skewing the figures on average annual pay for different ethnic groups. The Government are considering detailed responses from consultations and commission reports on ethnicity pay reporting.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.