← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Nuclear Fuel Manufacturing — [Mr Clive Betts in the Chair]
07 September 2021
Lead MP
Mark Menzies
Fylde
Con
Responding Minister
Amanda Solloway
Tags
EconomyEmploymentBusiness & Trade
Word Count: 12304
Other Contributors: 9
At a Glance
Mark Menzies raised concerns about nuclear fuel manufacturing — [mr clive betts in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The Government needs to affirm their backing for UK nuclear by approving proposals for new reactors like Sizewell C. They should also consider a regulatory framework and site proposals for future SMR projects, and hold meaningful discussions with EDF and US investors on manufacturing fuel in the United Kingdom.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Springfields nuclear fuel manufacturing plant in Fylde is the UK's only nuclear fuel manufacturing site, employing over 800 people directly and supporting thousands more jobs through its supply chain. With 70% of the site income related to advanced gas-cooled reactor fuel manufacture, a drop-off in demand due to early closure risks redundancies and loss of irreplaceable skills. The uncertainty around Dungeness B, Hinkley B, and Hunterston adds to the challenge.
Alan Brown
SNP
Clydebank and Bearsden
Mr Alan Brown questioned the strategic importance of nuclear energy in the UK, arguing that it is more expensive than other technologies like offshore wind. He highlighted market failures in the sector and expressed concerns over cost overruns at Hinkley Point C. He also raised doubts about the reliability and safety of EDF's projects, citing delays and safety issues in France and China. Mr Brown suggested a transition policy to support affected communities by diversifying into other energy sectors such as wave and tidal energy development. Asked about the timescale for small modular reactors and Sizewell C coming on stream. What does the Minister think is a realistic timescale for our Government agreeing a deal with EDF on Sizewell C?
Alan Whitehead
Lab
Southampton Testbourne
Alan Whitehead congratulated the hon. Member for securing an important debate on Springfields nuclear fuels and highlighted its unique role in supporting UK's nuclear programme. He emphasised that Springfields provides crucial fuel components for various types of reactors, including future new builds like Hinkley C and Sizewell C. However, there is a potential gap between these projects and the current state of operations at Springfields, raising concerns about its viability.
Chris Bryant
Lab
Rhondda
The right hon. Member made a powerful point about protecting Springfields as a strategic national asset, emphasising its importance for energy security and the workforce's readiness to take on new challenges.
Chris Green
Con
Blackpool North and Cleveleys
Mr Green visited Springfields to advocate for nuclear energy as a key component of the UK's reliable, clean, and affordable energy supply. He highlighted the importance of supporting British manufacturing industry by ensuring stable energy production, especially crucial for industries like steel that rely on electricity. Mr Green emphasized the reliability concerns with renewable sources like wind and solar, advocating for more reliance on nuclear in the short term while also noting the potential role of hydrogen technology. He underscored the need to secure Springfields' future and retain skilled workers through partnerships with French industry and consistent government support. Asked about reliance on wind or solar for consistent energy supply during periods without sufficient wind or sunlight, questioning the viability of battery storage and carbon capture technologies.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
He expressed support for nuclear power, emphasizing the importance of pursuing green energy within cost constraints. He highlighted the economic and environmental benefits of nuclear fuel manufacturing, including job creation and carbon emission reduction, particularly referencing projects like Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C. Shannon also called for Northern Ireland's inclusion in the supply chain and asked the Minister to outline how this could be achieved.
Dwyfor Meirionnydd
I am concerned that the UK had to activate West Burton A and now relies on coal for 3% of electricity generation, which contradicts the Government's goal of phasing out coal by 2024. Additionally, Trawsfynydd in my constituency is recognised as a suitable site for SMR, and I welcome Mike Tynan's appointment to Cwmni Egino. The risk of losing skills related to nuclear fuels and generation must be addressed if we are serious about considering nuclear power.
Mark Hendrick
Lab Co-op
Preston
Mr Hendrick congratulated the hon. Member for Fylde on securing this debate and highlighted the importance of nuclear fuel manufacturing to the UK's carbon-free future, particularly in Lancashire. He mentioned that Springfields, located near Preston, is facing uncertain times with potential redundancies threatening the industry's growth. Mr Hendrick also emphasized the role of universities and colleges in supporting the development of nuclear technology and skills, while acknowledging the need for international cooperation to address climate change. Inquired when carbon capture and storage would be done at a significant scale in the country.
Paul Maynard
Con
Wythenshawe and Sale East
Paul Maynard highlighted the importance of Springfields plant in driving economic development post-war, praising its role in the nuclear industry. He expressed concern over uncertain intentions regarding the site's future and urged the Government to ensure continuity of skills base, suggesting a guarantee for UK fuels for UK reactors.
Richard Graham
Con
Gloucester
Emphasised the need for consistent support of nuclear energy, highlighting its role in delivering low-carbon power and providing jobs. Discussed the importance of skill development through projects like Hinkley Point and Sizewell C, aiming to reduce dependence on foreign skills.
Government Response
Amanda Solloway
Government Response
Reaffirmed the strategic importance of maintaining sovereign fuel manufacturing capability. Highlighted UK's leadership in nuclear fuel cycle with highly skilled workforce at Springfields and Capenhurst sites. Announced up to £385 million for next generation technologies, £46 million programme focusing on advanced fuels for small and modular reactors. Emphasised commitment to levelling-up agenda through high-skilled jobs across UK. Noted nearly 2,000 apprenticeships delivered over 70 years at Springfields site. Discussed the importance of developing fuel-manufacturing capabilities to support nuclear ambitions. Mentioned short-term challenges facing Springfields site and plans for redundancies. Stressed ongoing work with industry, trade unions via the nuclear fuel working group to secure industry's future.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.