← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Social Justice and Fairness Commission

21 July 2021

Lead MP

Kirsten Oswald
East Renfrewshire
SNP

Responding Minister

Will Quince

Tags

EmploymentForeign AffairsBenefits & Welfare
Word Count: 7694
Other Contributors: 3

At a Glance

Kirsten Oswald raised concerns about social justice and fairness commission in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I ask the Government to consider the recommendations from the Social Justice and Fairness Commission and to take action towards democratic renewal, citizen empowerment, values rooted in human rights and equality, and transformative policies that put people's wellbeing first.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

East Renfrewshire
Opened the debate
I am concerned about the UK Government's undermining of devolution and their regressive decisions, such as allowing up to 3 million people to fall through pandemic support cracks, removing the £20 uplift in universal credit in September, and failing to bring forward an employment Bill. The commission also highlights issues like discriminatory welfare policies, a hostile immigration environment, and the lack of basic human rights under UK policy.

Government Response

Will Quince
Government Response
Responded to the debate on social justice, acknowledging concerns about poverty levels in Scotland. Noted UK Government's commitment to tackling poverty through measures like £407 billion spent on support during the pandemic and a focus on recovery via job creation initiatives such as Kickstart. Discussed universal credit reforms and automatic enrolment for pensions. Defended the two-child policy while noting exemptions for non-consensual sex cases.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.