← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Amnesty for Undocumented Migrants — [Stewart Hosie in the Chair]

19 July 2021

Lead MP

Tom Hunt

Responding Minister

Kevin Foster

Tags

ImmigrationAsylum & RefugeesMigrants & BordersTaxationForeign Affairs
Word Count: 13430
Other Contributors: 11

At a Glance

Tom Hunt raised concerns about amnesty for undocumented migrants — [stewart hosie in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The petition lacks clarity regarding the specifics of an amnesty, including frequency and criteria for eligibility. The speaker does not support a blanket amnesty due to concerns about open borders, illegal immigration, and fairness towards those who follow legal processes.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
The petition calls for a blanket amnesty for undocumented migrants in the UK, excluding those with criminal records. It has attracted 103,440 signatures and gained traction due to concerns over vaccine access during the pandemic. The debate acknowledges that regularising migrant status can lead to increased tax contributions but highlights challenges such as distinguishing between long-term residents and recent arrivals, potential social integration issues, and the impact on public services.

Government Response

Kevin Foster
Government Response
The Government is committed to an immigration policy that welcomes those who are here legally while deterring illegal immigration. The minister noted the complexities and ambiguities of defining undocumented migrants, including illegal entrants, overstayers, failed asylum seekers, and others not adhering to their stay conditions. He mentioned that there is no current reliable estimate of the number of undocumented migrants in the UK, with the last official Government estimate being around 430,000 in the mid-2000s, while a London School of Economics report estimated it at around 618,000 in 2009. The petition proposes an immediate amnesty for all those groups provided they do not have a criminal record. The minister emphasized that rewarding those who exploit the system and break rules undermines the integrity of the UK immigration system and may discourage lawful migration. He highlighted various schemes such as resettlement for genuine refugees, family reunion programs, and pathways to citizenship for British national overseas status holders facing restrictive laws in Hong Kong. The Government believes a fair system supports those in need while ensuring consequences for breaking rules. Regarding the petition's proposal for amnesty, the minister argued it undermines the immigration system's integrity, could be divisive among lawful migrants who have complied with policies, and might not build public confidence. He noted that undocumented migrants already have some avenues to regularize their status under current laws, including asylum claims, family rules, and private life rules. The minister concluded by stating that granting an amnesty as proposed would undermine the rules and make the creation of rules pointless if people could ignore them and still gain legal status.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.