← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Election Campaign Finances: Regulation
08 July 2021
Lead MP
Damian Collins
Folkestone and Hythe
Con
Responding Minister
Chloe Smith
Tags
Crime & Law EnforcementEconomyStandards & Ethics
Word Count: 11375
Other Contributors: 4
At a Glance
Damian Collins raised concerns about election campaign finances: regulation in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
Mr Collins asks the government to ensure greater transparency in campaign finance through electronic imprints on digital materials, standardised ad libraries, and measures against foreign electoral interference. He calls for technology companies to proactively prevent illegal campaigning rather than just reacting to it.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Mr Collins is concerned about the challenges in regulating election campaign finances due to technological changes. He highlights issues such as transparency of funding and campaigning, particularly online, where tracking money from foreign sources or shell companies can be difficult. He also mentions problems with dark money, fraudulent ads, and deepfake technology which could be used for political manipulation.
Airdrie and Shotts
Ms Qaisar-Javed expressed concerns about the challenges posed by social media in modern politics, highlighting how political parties have exploited voter data to undercut electoral finance laws. She cited examples of illegal practices such as Vote Leave's use of football sweepstakes data and the Conservatives' collection of ethnicity and nationality data for targeting voters. She also criticised the Tories' attacks on democracy, including scrapping the Electoral Commission and the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011. Social media has opened up our democracy, enthused many people and engaged new voters, but the key electoral legislation that we work under is old and needs to be updated.
Deidre Brock
SNP
Edinburgh North and Leith
Ms Brock commended the debate on transparent electoral campaigning and finances, highlighting issues such as social media campaigns, non-party campaigning groups, and the need to future-proof responses against technological advances. She mentioned examples of illegality in political campaigning and called for stronger democratic systems. Ms Brock also referred to recommendations from an all-party parliamentary group's report on electoral campaign transparency.
Fleur Anderson
Lab
Putney
Ms Anderson expressed concern over the complexity and fragmentation of electoral laws, highlighting their failure to adapt to the modern age. She criticised the Conservative Government for allowing wealthy foreign donors to fund campaigns under archaic laws that permit such activities. Ms Anderson also addressed concerns about the Elections Bill announced by the Government, which she believes weakens donation laws and opens up new loopholes in election finance regulation.
Stephen Kinnock
Lab
Aberafan Maesteg
Welcomed the report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life on election finance regulation, highlighting five measures introduced by the Elections Bill but noting they are not robust enough. Emphasised the need for a resilient system against hostile threats and stressed the importance of modernising the Electoral Commission to tackle dark money and dirty data. We have an opportunity to lead the world in regulating election campaign finances due to our strong democratic heritage, but the existing framework needs updating for the digital age.
Government Response
Chloe Smith
Government Response
The Government are committed to ensuring that our elections are secure, fair, modern and transparent. The existing regulatory framework for election campaign finances is comprehensive, but it needs updating, particularly with regard to digital imprints and foreign funding.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.