← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Delays in the Asylum System — [David Mundell in the Chair]

07 July 2021

Lead MP

Navendu Mishra
Stockport
Lab

Responding Minister

Chris Philp

Tags

Asylum & RefugeesNHSEmploymentForeign AffairsMental HealthLocal Government
Word Count: 13989
Other Contributors: 12

At a Glance

Navendu Mishra raised concerns about delays in the asylum system — [david mundell in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The MP urges the government to enable asylum seekers to work, lift the ban on their right to employment and improve the dispersal system for better distribution across local authorities. He also calls for reforms in the registration, screening, and decision-making process as proposed by the United Nations Human Rights Council.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Stockport
Opened the debate
The MP is concerned about the delays in the asylum system and the mistreatment of asylum seekers. He mentions that over half of the almost 40,000 people in detention centres have been waiting for a decision for more than a year, with many having waited up to five years. The average wait time for an asylum decision is 51 days, with some cases taking up to 82 days. He also highlights issues such as the Aspen card handover debacle and the poor treatment of women in the asylum process. Additionally, he notes high levels of mental health problems among asylum seekers, with refugees being five times more likely than the general UK population to have mental health needs.

Government Response

Chris Philp
Government Response
The Home Office recognises the importance of addressing delays in the asylum system. Efforts are underway to reduce backlog, including the establishment of new decision-making units and the introduction of a digital claims process aimed at improving turnaround times. Thank you, Mr Mundell. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship—I think for the first time, and I hope not for the last. Let me outline the steps that the United Kingdom has been taking and is taking to discharge our obligations to people who are in need of protection; they are obligations that we stand by and will not resile from. Our resettlement programme, which has taken off since around 2015, has seen a total of 25,000 people directly resettled into the United Kingdom from places of danger, with 20,000 under the vulnerable persons resettlement scheme focusing on Syria. This number is more than any other European country. We also offer safe and legal routes via refugee family reunion, which has seen about 29,000 people come into the UK over the past five or six years, half of whom were children. The UK received 44,800 individual asylum applications in 2019, making us fifth among EU countries for that year, and only Greece had a higher intake than the UK's 3,775 unaccompanied asylum-seeking children under 18. When it comes to supporting asylum seekers, we provide accommodation, free healthcare, council tax and utilities paid for, free education for those under 18, and a cash allowance. The system costs about £1 billion a year due to the backlog, making our provisions more generous than many European countries. The Nationality and Borders Bill is intended to be fair to those in genuine need but firm where people abuse the system, continuing the resettlement programme beyond the 20,000 commitment met earlier this year. The bill aims to shut down illegal routes into the UK by ensuring that anyone crossing the English Channel from France does not directly flee a war zone and should claim asylum at their first safe place. Regarding delays in the asylum system, they are higher now than last year due to disruption caused by covid-19. Asylum interviews stopped entirely for months as it was unsafe to have face-to-face interviews. The number of decisions taken has been dramatically lower over the past year and three months, leading to a backlog and delays. To address this, we are introducing remote interviewing by video link, trialling interviews in places like Napier barracks, opening additional registration centres across the UK, investing in better IT systems, shortening letters for granted asylum cases, and introducing specialist caseworkers. The aim is to increase staffing levels from 550 full-time equivalents to 1,000 over time to speed up decision-making.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.