← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Trans-Pennine Railway

30 June 2021

Lead MP

Judith Cummins
Bradford South
Lab

Responding Minister

Robbie Moore

Tags

EconomyTransport
Word Count: 3808
Other Contributors: 2

At a Glance

Judith Cummins raised concerns about trans-pennine railway in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I ask the Minister to provide Parliament today with details on Northern Powerhouse Rail stops that the Prime Minister refused to give a journalist. The Government must either deliver fully on NPR or not at all.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Bradford South
Opened the debate
I am concerned that the Government plans to short-change the north by cutting back on Northern Powerhouse Rail and bypassing Bradford altogether. Documents reveal that the Government is preparing a diluted version of NPR under the guise of the trans-Pennine route upgrade. The north has endured decades of under-investment, and the potential for economic growth is unparalleled with £343 billion in economic output from eight UK top research institutions and 27 universities.

Government Response

Robbie Moore
Government Response
Welcomed contributions from neighbouring constituencies, highlighting the Government's commitment to Northern Powerhouse Rail. Stressed the importance of Bradford as a vibrant city contributing to northern economic development. Acknowledged ongoing evaluation of options under NPR and noted the Prime Minister's earlier statement on investment in railways in the North. Assured that the integrated rail plan will be published soon to reflect decisions made, considering evidence from various sources. Emphasised the Government's focus on growing economies and levelling up northern regions through a holistic approach.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.