← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Human Rights in Hong Kong — [Ms Nusrat Ghani in the Chair]

09 June 2021

Lead MP

Tom Randall

Responding Minister

Nigel Adams

Tags

ImmigrationForeign Affairs
Word Count: 13149
Other Contributors: 14

At a Glance

Tom Randall raised concerns about human rights in hong kong — [ms nusrat ghani in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The MP asks whether further measures might be taken to address China's actions in Hong Kong, including working with allies for a coordinated approach, considering targeted sanctions against officials involved in human rights breaches, and assessing the effectiveness of current measures such as suspending the UK's extradition treaty and extending military item embargoes.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
The MP is concerned about the violation of human rights and freedoms in Hong Kong as stipulated by the Sino-British joint declaration. He highlights specific incidents such as the national security law, restrictions on freedom of movement, press censorship, and the impact on individuals like Donna Kong, Jimmy Lai, and Martin Lee who have faced severe consequences for their activism or criticism.

Government Response

Nigel Adams
Government Response
The Minister for Asia, Nigel Adams, acknowledged the deep concern over Beijing's actions in Hong Kong. He detailed measures such as extending arms embargoes and suspending extradition treaties with Hong Kong. The new visa route for British nationals overseas was introduced to protect rights promised under the Sino-British joint declaration. Adams also noted ongoing dialogue with other nations through platforms like the G7, highlighting a commitment to upholding international legal obligations.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.