← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Cyber-Fraud in the UK

25 May 2021

Lead MP

Chris Elmore
Bridgend
Lab

Responding Minister

Kit Malthouse

Tags

Crime & Law EnforcementNHSScience & Technology
Word Count: 7516
Other Contributors: 6

At a Glance

Chris Elmore raised concerns about cyber-fraud in the uk in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government must take decisive action to address cyber-fraud at the root level, including publishing comprehensive guidance for private sector organisations on lawful information sharing with law enforcement, increasing resourcing for the National Economic Crime Victim Care Unit, and developing skills and capabilities within the public sector. The Government should also clarify which Department leads on cybersecurity and internet safety.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Bridgend
Opened the debate
The scale and scope of cyber-fraud are growing exponentially, impacting individuals and businesses across the country. The problem is not limited to specific constituencies but affects everyone equally. During the pandemic, brand cloning scams have quadrupled, with reported losses increasing from £4 million in July to £9.4 million by October. Additionally, there has been an explosion of NHS scams preying on people's fears and concerns. The lack of a standardised response mechanism hinders effective reporting and tracking of fraud incidents.

Government Response

Kit Malthouse
Government Response
Acknowledged the importance of addressing cyber-fraud highlighted by Members. Stated that over a third of all crime was attributed to fraud in 2020. Discussed initiatives like increasing police capabilities, launching public safety messaging, and including user-generated fraud in the Online Safety Bill to protect victims and prevent such crimes.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.