← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Asylum Dispersal Scheme: Stoke-on-Trent
25 May 2021
Lead MP
Jonathan Gullis
Responding Minister
Kevin Foster
Tags
Asylum & RefugeesDefenceEmploymentForeign AffairsLocal Government
Word Count: 4816
Other Contributors: 1
At a Glance
Jonathan Gullis raised concerns about asylum dispersal scheme: stoke-on-trent in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The MP asks for reform to mandate councils that refuse to participate in dispersing asylum seekers to take their fair share, ensuring an equitable distribution of the burden across all local authorities. He also suggests dividing support budgets into ring-fenced grants tailored to local needs and urging the Minister to seriously consider recommendations from Stoke-on-Trent City Council.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
The city of Stoke-on-Trent has a high ratio of asylum seekers per population, with one in every 250 people being an asylum seeker. The cluster limit ratio is also very high at 79%, compared to 29% in Birmingham. Stoke-on-Trent will face further strain as it is set to receive around 1,760 more asylum seekers under Operation Oak, potentially pushing the city beyond its one-in-200 limit. Some wards are already exceeding this limit with ratios as high as one in 44 and one in 30.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
He congratulates the hon. Gentleman on securing this debate and discusses the Government's proposal that by 2029, supported asylum seekers accommodated in each government region will reflect their share of the United Kingdom population. He suggests there must be substantially greater funding to establish suitable family housing, noting that there are currently 4,000 people on the housing list. The hon. Member for Strangford highlighted that Stoke-on-Trent is facing challenges in housing young families and elderly people due to the influx of asylum seekers, leading to strain on public services like schools and public transport.
Government Response
Kevin Foster
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship for the first time, Ms Bardell. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Stoke-on-Trent North (Jonathan Gullis) for securing this debate on asylum dispersal in Stoke-on-Trent. Our United Kingdom has a proud record of helping people facing persecution, oppression and tyranny, standing by our moral and legal obligations to help innocent civilians fleeing cruelty around the world. The pandemic has had a significant impact on the system of supported asylum accommodation run by the Home Office, leading to a 30% increase in demand for accommodation during the pandemic, with more than 60,000 asylum seekers currently being provided with accommodation while their claims are considered. This includes using contingency accommodation like hotels and Ministry of Defence sites. We have consistently met our statutory obligations to destitute asylum seekers and we aim to reduce reliance on such accommodation by procuring more housing. The Government will focus on working with local authorities in the UK to move towards a more equitable dispersal of asylum seekers, aiming for areas like Stoke-on-Trent to take a fairer share as the system reforms. Local authorities are encouraged to contribute their share and increase the number of areas accommodating and supporting people seeking asylum protection. The Government demand the highest standards from contractors and their accommodation, ensuring properties comply with decent homes standard and relevant national or local housing legislation. We have worked closely with providers to improve property standards over time, conducting inspections regularly. When issues are raised, they are addressed quickly; only 17 out of 3,300 inspected properties had defects requiring immediate action in the last year. During the pandemic, hotel use has been a necessary contingency option but not ideal for long-term solutions. We believe that the hotel and contingency accommodation we provide is of good quality, meeting all public health guidance and usual contracted standards. The root issue in Stoke-on-Trent lies with our broken asylum system, which is expensive and has lost public trust. It is vital to protect genuine refugees while deterring illegal entry into the UK through expedited removals for those without legitimate claims. Our new plan for immigration aims to increase fairness and efficacy of the system by protecting those who genuinely need asylum support while breaking the business model of people-smuggling networks, ensuring safer lives for those at risk from dangerous and unnecessary sea crossings.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.