← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Redundancy Protection: Women and New Parents

28 April 2021

Lead MP

Kirsten Oswald
East Renfrewshire
SNP

Responding Minister

Paul Scully

Tags

EmploymentForeign AffairsWomen & EqualitiesParliamentary Procedure
Word Count: 4173
Other Contributors: 1

At a Glance

Kirsten Oswald raised concerns about redundancy protection: women and new parents in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Ms. Oswald asks the Government to urgently implement legislation to extend redundancy protection throughout pregnancy and maternity leave, and for six months afterwards, similar to the ten-minute rule Bill introduced by the right hon. Member for Basingstoke. She also seeks the Government's plans to protect women and new parents in their employment during and post-pandemic.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

East Renfrewshire
Opened the debate
Ms. Oswald is concerned about the lack of progress in extending redundancy protection for women and new parents due to employment law being reserved to Westminster. She highlighted that one in 20 new mothers are made redundant during pregnancy or maternity leave, or on their return to work, which demonstrates a disturbing level of disregard among employers for the needs of women and families. She also mentioned cases like Jessica's and Mandy's as examples of unfair treatment due to pregnancy.

Government Response

Paul Scully
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Dame Angela. I congratulate the hon. Member for East Renfrewshire on securing today's important debate on extending redundancy protections for women and new parents. There can be no excuse for discrimination against pregnant women or women on maternity leave; it is unlawful and cannot be tolerated as we rebuild after the pandemic. Research funded by the Government and EHRC highlights that one in nine mothers report dismissal, compulsory redundancy or poor treatment leading to job loss, which could affect 54,000 mothers a year if scaled up nationally. One in five mothers also experience harassment or negative comments related to pregnancy or flexible working from employers or colleagues, potentially impacting 100,000 women annually. The Government will ensure the redundancy protection period applies from when an employee informs their employer of her pregnancy and extend this for six months after a new mother returns to work. They plan to introduce these measures as soon as parliamentary time allows. While there is support for state enforcement in redundancies involving pregnant women or new mothers, caution must be exercised due to the complexity of employment disputes. The Government's preferred approach retains and extends preferential treatment for pregnant women and new parents, providing a period up to 27 months when they are first in line for suitable remaining jobs during redundancy situations. Addressing discrimination at earlier stages of employment is crucial; hence, an employer and family representative group will be set up to develop recommendations on improving information availability and shifting the focus from end-of-process issues to proactive measures.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.