← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Immigration Detention: Victims of Trafficking

27 April 2021

Lead MP

Richard Fuller
North Bedfordshire
Con

Responding Minister

Not recorded

Tags

Immigration
Word Count: 3569
Other Contributors: 1

At a Glance

Richard Fuller raised concerns about immigration detention: victims of trafficking in Westminster Hall. Response awaited from government.

Key Requests to Government:

Mr. Fuller asks the Minister why he wants to make changes that may increase the likelihood of detaining potential victims of trafficking and modern-day slavery. He requests confirmation that a consultation was held prior to laying the statutory instrument and which organizations were consulted. Mr. Fuller also seeks clarity on whether the new regulations are against the government's stated aim to protect victims, and he asks about specific recommendations from inspections that have been implemented.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

North Bedfordshire
Opened the debate
Mr. Fuller is concerned about the changes to immigration detention policies, particularly regarding potential victims of trafficking and modern-day slavery. He cites a Home Office report that indicates 89% of individuals referred through the national referral mechanism after being detained received positive reasonable grounds decisions, with 98% subsequently released from detention. The Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner's letter notes significant variation in rejection rates for detention due to AAR status. Mr. Fuller also mentions a Home Office consultation that did not include the Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner and raises concerns about the downgrade of protections under the new regulations as stated by Medical Justice. He highlights the Royal College of Psychiatrists' report on detention, noting its opposition to detaining individuals with mental disorders.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.