← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Religious Minorities: Land Rights

22 April 2021

Lead MP

Jim Shannon
Strangford
DUP

Responding Minister

James Cleverly

Tags

Foreign Affairs
Word Count: 9188
Other Contributors: 4

At a Glance

Jim Shannon raised concerns about religious minorities: land rights in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government should continue its commitment to accountability for abuses against religious minorities in bilateral and multilateral efforts. Ministers are encouraged to make public statements on these issues and show solidarity with the Baha'is by standing up for their rights.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Strangford
Opened the debate
The Baha'i community in Iran faces severe land rights violations, including the expropriation of farmland and homes in Ivel village. The community has endured legal challenges since 1983, with bulldozers demolishing homes in 2010. Recent court rulings have denied ownership claims for many Baha'is, targeting their economic sustenance. Additionally, there is a worrying directive from Sari's Commission on Ethnicities, Sects and Religions aiming to rigorously control the lives of Baha'is, including monitoring them and enforcing conversion. The situation reflects escalating persecution across Iran post-pandemic.

Government Response

James Cleverly
Government Response
The Government support land governance for economic development and human rights protection, expressing deep concern over the declining land rights of religious minorities in Iran. They have taken steps to raise these issues internationally, including at the Human Rights Council, and continue to work with faith leaders to advocate for religious freedom worldwide.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.