← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Union Connectivity Review

16 March 2021

Lead MP

John Lamont
Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk
Con

Responding Minister

Rachel Maclean

Tags

TransportScotlandBenefits & Welfare
Word Count: 9015
Other Contributors: 11

At a Glance

John Lamont raised concerns about union connectivity review in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The MP asks that Governments at all levels support the Union connectivity review to enhance cross-border transport links and improve lives in rural communities. He calls on the Scottish Government to join the UK Government in improving connectivity without political barriers.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk
Opened the debate
The MP is concerned about the lack of cross-border connectivity in the Scottish borders. He mentions that his constituents rely on economic centers across the border and highlights the importance of extending rail links to Carlisle. The SNP Government's reluctance to engage with the review and accelerate this project puzzles him. He also emphasizes the need for improved transport infrastructure, such as the A1 trunk road improvements between Newcastle and Edinburgh, and the potential benefits of a £10 million feasibility study for extending the borders railway.

Government Response

Rachel Maclean
Government Response
The Minister responded positively to the debate, thanking Members for their contributions. She outlined the work of Sir Peter Hendy's Union Connectivity Review, noting broad support for a UK strategic transport network despite lack of engagement from the SNP Government in Scotland. She mentioned £20 million of funding made available by the UK Government to assess options on road and rail schemes identified as crucial for cross-border connectivity.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.