← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Future of Rail Services
20 December 2022
Lead MP
Stephen Hammond
Wimbledon
Con
Responding Minister
Huw Merriman
Tags
EconomyTaxationEmploymentTransportParliamentary Procedure
Word Count: 4285
Other Contributors: 6
At a Glance
Stephen Hammond raised concerns about future of rail services in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
I ask the Government to consider separating GBR's role as guiding mind from its infrastructure provider duties, introducing a spectrum of possibilities for train operating companies that includes revenue risk sharing and slot auctions, and ensuring greater competition in railway operations. Additionally, there should be a commitment to review the current arrangements after two years to adapt as needed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The rail industry has been severely impacted by the pandemic, leading to a collapse in ridership and financial difficulties for train operating companies. Prior to the pandemic, issues arose from overly prescriptive franchising practices and excessive government interference, which stifled initiative and led to inefficiencies such as high levels of delays caused by Network Rail. The Williams review highlighted necessary changes but also introduced problematic elements like the concept of Great British Railways (GBR), perceived as a form of renationalisation with potential drawbacks. There is concern about insufficient emphasis on the benefits brought by private sector involvement and lack of incentives for operators to provide enhanced services.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Commends the hon. Gentleman for securing this debate, emphasizing the importance of connectivity in rural communities and advocating for expansion of the rail network to tackle isolation. Asked about regional connectivity mentioned in the HLOS and highlighted the importance of local, regional, and national schemes for investment.
Supports a slimline future system operator focused on customer priorities rather than technical aspects, advocating for decentralization of power to create a more flexible rail system.
The speaker raised concerns about the difficulties faced by people with disabilities in accessing rail services, ticketing offices and disabled toilet facilities. She asked the Minister to consider these inclusion issues in his future vision.
Martin Vickers
Con
Brigg and Immingham
Campaigns for the restoration of three trains between Cleethorpes and King's Cross, seeking assurance from the Minister on whether these services are likely to materialize next May.
Munira Wilson
Lib Dem
Twickenham
The speaker highlighted that until the new year, there will be no services at all on non-strike days at 40 stations across South Western Railway's network. She asked what measures the Minister was taking to ensure service availability on these days and questioned how industrial relations can improve if passengers cannot access their destinations.
Richard Foord
Lib Dem
Honiton and Sidmouth
Highlights the reopening of Okehampton railway station in Devon as an example of successful rural connectivity and asks about potential developments at Cullompton railway station.
Government Response
Huw Merriman
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Robertson. The Government remain committed to rail reform and ensuring high-quality services across the country. Keith Williams conducted a review leading to the publication of the plan for rail White Paper in 2021. Personnel changes have occurred since then, but reforms are being reviewed with concrete proposals expected shortly. Reforms aim to address industrial relations, performance issues, and financial challenges by involving the private sector to regrow passenger numbers. Ticket offices should be modernised with personnel assisting those with disabilities on platforms and trains. Industrial action must cease as it impacts service reliability. The Government will invest £360 million in reforming fares and ticketing, introducing tap-in/tap-out at additional stations and contactless pay-as-you-go ticketing at over 200 stations in the south-east. A new guiding mind is being considered to simplify accountability without nationalisation. Rail reform must have greater private sector involvement for innovation, quality focus, and taxpayer value return. Open access operators like Go-Op are supported, but entrance requirements may need reform. Legislation will be introduced when parliamentary timetable allows, with significant investment in ticketing and retail in the interim. The Government published a £44 billion funding settlement for control period 7, ensuring long-term commitment to safe, reliable rail services. Industrial action must end; unions and employers have been met by the Minister and Secretary of State. All parties are urged to work together positively.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.