Ms Thewliss highlighted the need for asylum seekers to be able to work, citing examples of individuals who have been unable to volunteer or take on jobs due to Home Office restrictions. She mentioned the financial strain faced by families and the difficulty in maintaining skills while waiting for decisions. She emphasized the importance of supporting asylum seekers' contributions to society and criticized the Government's failure to address these issues.

I am concerned about the Home Office's failure to make timely decisions on asylum claims, resulting in individuals living in limbo for years. I highlighted a constituent who has been waiting seven years for a decision and mentioned that if half of those awaiting a decision were allowed to work, it would generate nearly £200 million annually in tax revenues. Additionally, there are shortages of staff in various sectors such as hospitality, teaching, and HGV drivers, yet asylum seekers are not permitted to fill these roles. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that employment provides purpose and meaning for asylum seekers, protecting them from exploitation? Carol also criticised the portrayal of hotel accommodation as luxury, describing it as an unpleasant experience without basic facilities and privacy. Will the Minister give way?

I agreed with allowing asylum seekers to work would not only be morally justified but also economically beneficial, improving their standard of living and engagement in UK society. This would counter the propaganda that portrays them as a drain on resources. Does the hon. Member not agree that the immigration system is based on the hostile environment and that we are going to have difficulties unless we do something about that? The Immigration Acts of 2014 and 2016 effectively introduced internal borders, meaning every aspect of someone's life, including accessing services like a bank, is policed by immigration control internally.

Mr. Shannon spoke about the need for compassion and support for asylum seekers in his constituency who are struggling to survive on low allowances while waiting for decisions, highlighting the challenges of rising costs and limited job opportunities. He cited examples of companies offering jobs but lacking a way to connect them with skilled asylum seekers. He urged the Government to consider lifting the ban on work for asylum seekers and proposed community service as an alternative to gainful employment.

She congratulates the hon. Member for securing the debate, expresses concern over the inadequacy of asylum support allowance increases compared to inflation, and points out that refugees are struggling with basic necessities due to rising costs. Intervened to express concern that the government's restrictions on asylum seekers contribute to misconceptions about refugees, potentially leading to racism. I agreed with Carol Monaghan that allowing refugees to work would facilitate faster integration into their communities and could help tackle modern slavery. According to the Lift the Ban campaign, it could benefit the economy by £97.8 million per year in net gains for the Government.

Discussed the importance of integrating asylum seekers into society and the economy, highlighting labour shortages in various sectors. She proposed an employment programme for asylum seekers to address skills gaps and boost economic recovery. The Minister is reeling off the Government's current policy, which clearly is failing catastrophically, and then highlighting shortages in the labour market. There is so much need in the labour market because of the lack of supply of skills.

I call upon the government to address the cost of living crisis faced by asylum seekers and ensure that they have access to fair employment opportunities. He echoed concerns about the slow asylum claim processing and the resulting backlog of 143,000 cases. He criticised the Government's decision to downgrade asylum decision makers' job grades, leading to less experienced staff and slower decisions. Kinnock highlighted that the taxpayer is spending nearly £7 million daily on emergency accommodation in hotels for asylum seekers. He also mentioned the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 as worsening the situation with additional bureaucracy. He called for reducing the waiting period before asylum seekers can work from one year to six months. When Labour left Government in 2010, there were 6,000 outstanding asylum cases for more than six months.

I argue that giving asylum seekers the right to work is a pragmatic solution, allowing them to contribute financially while integrating into society. The current system's high cost is due to inefficiencies rather than an influx of refugees. I highlight how denying employment rights can push people into modern slavery and exploitation. The UK's reputation as a place of sanctuary should be leveraged positively. Providing asylum seekers with work opportunities would alleviate economic pressures and improve their mental health. The Minister is talking about people coming through established routes, but there are hardly any. Unless someone is from Ukraine or Syria or Afghanistan, they cannot get to the country safely without doing what the Government now decide is illegal.