← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

International Human Rights Day

08 December 2022

Lead MP

Margaret Ferrier
Rutherglen and Hamilton West
SNP

Responding Minister

Anne-Marie Trevelyan

Tags

Crime & Law EnforcementUkraine
Word Count: 22766
Other Contributors: 11

At a Glance

Margaret Ferrier raised concerns about international human rights day in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I ask the Government to resume publishing their annual human rights report and releasing updates on human rights cases. The reports provide a useful summary of action undertaken by the FCDO and demonstrate the UK Government's ongoing commitment to international human rights frameworks. Bruce asked the Government to support efforts at the UN General Assembly to call for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty for blasphemy offences. She also urged the Government to facilitate an immediate response to atrocity crimes, including genocide, and recommended that time be given for the Genocide Determination Bill to be considered.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Rutherglen and Hamilton West
Opened the debate
I am concerned about the continued prevalence of authoritarian regimes and governments that commit serious human rights violations. The situation in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Bahrain, Egypt, Tunisia, and Zimbabwe remains challenging with issues such as arbitrary detention, unfair trials, torture, executions for non-violent crimes, and persecution of political prisoners and human rights defenders. Over 50% of those executed in Saudi Arabia were convicted on the basis of their participation in pro-democracy demonstrations; Iran continues to implement the death penalty for various offences including insulting the Prophet and same-sex relations; and in Egypt, thousands are unjustly imprisoned with poor conditions. In Tunisia, there is democratic backsliding following a coup by President Saied, who suspended Parliament and took wide-ranging powers. In her speech, Fiona Bruce highlighted the ongoing persecution and imprisonment of individuals across the world due to their religious beliefs. She cited cases such as Zhang Zhan in China, Shamil Khakimov in Tajikistan, Hanna Abdirahman Abdimalik in Somalia, Mubarak Bala in Nigeria, Shagufta Kausar and Shafqat Emmanuel in Pakistan, Yahaya Sharif-Aminu in Nigeria. Bruce also raised concerns over blasphemy laws and death penalties for such offences, stating that there are still 12 countries where individuals can be sentenced to death for blasphemy.

Government Response

Anne-Marie Trevelyan
Government Response
I thank the hon. Member for Rutherglen and Hamilton West (Margaret Ferrier) for securing this important debate. The UK has a long-standing commitment to protecting and promoting human rights globally, focusing on multilateral work, bilateral relations, and targeted campaigns. In multilateral efforts, the UK supports UN Human Rights Council resolutions and raises concerns with countries like Iran and China over their human rights violations. Bilaterally, the UK works to support political progress in Bahrain and engages with Saudi Arabia regarding the Jamal Khashoggi murder case. The UK also provides £220 million of humanitarian support for Ukraine and has imposed sanctions on Chinese officials responsible for human rights abuses in Xinjiang. Concerns were raised about Egypt's legal process for recognising dual nationality, impacting consular access to Alaa Abd El-Fattah. The UK continues to advance priority issues through annual human rights reports and initiatives like preventing sexual violence in conflict, committing £12.5 million to a new three-year strategy.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.